Automated Tasking System for Crowdsourcing Accuracy and Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Crowdsourcing for large data problems faces challenges such as incomplete, imprecise, and time-consuming task completion, leading to increased costs and resource wastage due to inefficient manual pairing and compensation of individuals for data input tasks.

Innovation Solution

A tasking system that includes a targeting module for user profiling, a prediction module for task assignment based on past performance, an assignment module for workflow management, and an assessment module for quality control, ensuring accurate and efficient task completion by assigning tasks to the most suitable users and monitoring progress.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If crowdsourcing is used to solve large data problems by breaking them into smaller tasks, then the large data problem can be completed through individual contributions, but the smaller tasks may not be completed correctly leading to incorrect completion of the large data problem

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask completion speedVSAvoidtask completion accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated accuracy assessment that provides feedback on task completion quality. The assessment module evaluates whether submitted data points meet predefined accuracy criteria, and this feedback is used to determine whether tasks need to be redone, thereby improving overall reliability while maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-defining accuracy criteria and expected data point ranges before tasks are assigned. This allows the assessment module to automatically evaluate task completions against these pre-established standards, ensuring correctness without requiring manual review of each task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Speed

If the crowd is compensated to increase speed of input, then the speed of data input increases, but the costs become cost prohibitive and results may still be unacceptable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata input speedVSAvoidcompensation cost
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service through automated accuracy assessment that evaluates task completions without requiring expensive manual review. The assessment module automatically determines whether data points are correct based on pre-defined criteria, eliminating the need for costly human verification while maintaining high input speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical system of manual task verification with an automated computational assessment module. This substitution eliminates the need for expensive human reviewers while maintaining accurate evaluation of task completions, thereby reducing costs while preserving speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If manual pairing of individuals and tasks is performed to ensure correct completion, then task assignment accuracy may improve, but the process becomes time consuming and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask assignment accuracyVSAvoidtask assignment time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual task assignment with an automated assignment module that uses algorithms to match tasks with appropriate crowd members. This computational approach maintains reliable task assignment by considering relevant criteria while eliminating the time-consuming nature of manual pairing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The assignment module operates autonomously to match tasks with suitable individuals based on predefined criteria and historical performance data. This self-service capability eliminates the need for manual intervention in task assignment while maintaining high accuracy in matching tasks with capable workers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Measurement precision

If data is not analyzed quickly to determine whether it is within proper margin of expected results, then thorough analysis can be performed, but the data ultimately becomes unusable and requires redoing tasks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata analysis thoroughnessVSAvoiddata analysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-defining acceptable data ranges and accuracy criteria before data collection begins. This allows the assessment module to quickly evaluate incoming data against these pre-established standards, providing thorough analysis through automated comparison while enabling rapid determination of whether data points are correct.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces thorough but time-consuming manual data analysis with automated computational assessment. The assessment module rapidly evaluates data points against pre-defined criteria using computational methods, achieving both thoroughness in evaluation and speed in processing that eliminates the need to redo tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10733556B2Automated tasking and accuracy assessment systems and methods for assigning and assessing individuals and tasks
Publication Date: 2020.08.04 AURORA OPERATIONS INC
  • US10733556B2 patent drawing
  • US10733556B2 patent drawing
  • US10733556B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a tasking system to assign individuals to tasks. The tasking system targets a user for the task based information in a user profile such as demographics, background and reputation of the user to perform a task. The tasking system predicts if a user will do a given task well based on a user's background, user's skill, and applied predictive algorithms. The tasking system manages the workflow of the task, assesses the probability of the user's answer being accurate, and continuously optimizes assignment and assessment of the task to improve data quality.