Automated Tender Voting System for Employee Stock Plans

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems lack an efficient and streamlined method for facilitating corporate actions such as tender offers and Dutch auction tenders, particularly for employees holding shares through 401K and ESOP plans, in terms of voting processes and reporting mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that generates a Tender control number for employees to submit votes, allowing them to choose from tender offer types, automatically calculates voting shares, and dynamically outputs voting progress reports, while ensuring compliance with pre-determined rules and security measures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a fixed price tender offer is used, then the offer is simple to structure, but it lacks flexibility for employees to choose their tender price

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility for employees to choose tender priceVSAvoidcomplexity of tender offer structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the tender offer structure by allowing employees to select from multiple pricing options (fixed price or Dutch auction) and enables real-time price discovery through the Dutch auction mechanism where prices are adjusted based on employee responses until equilibrium is reached

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the price parameter from a single fixed value to a range of possible values, allowing employees to express their willingness to tender at different price points. The Dutch auction mechanism iteratively adjusts the price parameter based on aggregate employee responses

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If manual processing of tender votes is used, then the system is simple to implement, but it is time-consuming and prone to errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speed of tender votesVSAvoidcomplexity of voting system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual mechanical processing of tender votes with an automated computer-based system that electronically receives, validates, and processes employee tender indications, eliminating manual intervention and significantly increasing processing speed and accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables employees to self-submit their tender indications directly through the automated platform, with the system automatically matching tenders to available shares and calculating outcomes without requiring manual intervention from administrators

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Loss of information

If comprehensive reporting of tender progress is provided, then transparency is improved, but the complexity of reporting mechanisms increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransparency of voting progressVSAvoidcomplexity of reporting mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback by automatically generating and distributing reports that show tender progress, acceptance rates, and pricing information to relevant parties, enabling real-time monitoring and decision-making without requiring complex manual reporting processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9009062B2Facilitating corporate tenders/Dutch auction tenders and computer-implemented methods and computer systems thereof
Publication Date: 2015.04.14 BROADRIDGE FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS
  • US9009062B2 patent drawing
  • US9009062B2 patent drawing
  • US9009062B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In some embodiments, the instant invention provides a programmed system having a computer programmed with software instructions that include at least: code to receive an electronic Tender voting request to conduct a Tender voting; where the Tender voting is limited to a plurality of employees who has owned shares of an issuer at a record date via at least one of: i) at least one 401K plan, and ii) at least one employee stock ownership plan (ESOP); where the Tender voting is selected from the group of Tender voting types consisting of: i) a Tender offer, ii) an All-or-None Tender offer, and iii) a Dutch Tender auction; code to identify the plurality of employees; code to generate a plurality of programmed visual computer screens to allow the plurality of employees to submit Tender votes; and code to dynamically output a report identifying a progress of the Tender voting.