AI-Driven Test Script Generation to Accelerate QA Planning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual test case generation in software development is inefficient, time-consuming, and prone to errors, struggling to keep pace with rapid development and release cycles, leading to delays and inconsistencies in software quality assurance.

Innovation Solution

Utilizing large language models (LLMs) trained on product documentation and legacy test strategies to automatically generate comprehensive test strategies and scripts, aligning with agile development cycles and optimizing resource allocation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual test case generation is used, then test strategies can be customized and reviewed, but the process is time-consuming and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest generation speedVSAvoidtime for test planning
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of test case generation with an AI-based automated system. The AI model analyzes product documentation, requirements, and legacy test cases to automatically generate new test strategies, eliminating the need for manual creation while maintaining comprehensive test coverage and alignment with development cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service test generation where the AI autonomously creates test strategies by processing available documentation and requirements without human intervention. The generated test cases are immediately available for execution, allowing QA teams to rapidly adapt to new features and releases without manual effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If comprehensive test coverage is achieved with multiple combinations, then quality evaluation is thorough, but the complexity of testing processes increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality assuranceVSAvoidtesting process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex testing process into manageable components by generating test cases organized into structured test strategies. Each test strategy focuses on specific features or functionality areas, breaking down the overwhelming complexity of comprehensive testing into organized, executable units that maintain thorough coverage without process complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts test parameters and combinations based on the specific features being tested, product requirements, and legacy test patterns. This allows comprehensive coverage to be achieved by changing test parameters rather than manually designing complex test processes for each scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If manual test generation keeps pace with rapid development cycles, then quality assurance can be maintained, but resource burden on QA teams increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevelopment cycle alignmentVSAvoidQA resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual QA resources with an automated AI system that generates test strategies at the speed required by rapid development cycles. The AI processes documentation and requirements instantly, creating comprehensive test cases without the time constraints and resource limitations of manual generation, allowing QA to keep pace with any development velocity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides continuous test generation capability that operates whenever new features or requirements are added to the product. The AI model continuously processes updated documentation and generates corresponding test strategies, ensuring quality assurance remains synchronized with ongoing development without requiring additional human resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20250217269A1Augmented test execution based on ai-driven test script generation
Publication Date: 2025.07.03 SAP SE
  • US20250217269A1 patent drawing
  • US20250217269A1 patent drawing
  • US20250217269A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including medium-encoded computer program products for executing a test strategy, include: receiving a request to generate a test script for a new test strategy defined for a software solution, wherein the received request includes a specification of the new test strategy; generating the test script based on executing a large language model that receives as input the specification of the new test strategy, wherein the large language model is trained to automatically generate test scripts based on technical documentation for a testing framework defined for the software solution and integration tests generated for the software solution; and executing the test script for the new test strategy to obtain output data, the output data including performance data for the software solution.