Automated Testing Script Generation for Manufacturing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for creating testing scripts in manufacturing environments are manual, error-prone, and limited by data from a single location, leading to location-specific experiments that require numerous repetitions, consuming resources and producing suboptimal results.

Innovation Solution

An automated system generates testing scripts based on demand data from multiple manufacturing locations, providing a graphical user interface for users to select settings and generate scripts that simulate real-life activities across multiple locations, enabling standardized and broadly applicable experiments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If testing scripts are created manually based on data from a single manufacturing location, then the scripts can be generated with minimal automation, but the experiments become location-specific and require numerous repetitions consuming significant resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of testing script generationVSAvoidcomplexity of testing script generation system
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates virtual copies of manufacturing locations and their operational data through virtualization technology. These virtual representations allow testing scripts to be generated and executed without requiring physical replication of entire manufacturing environments, reducing resource consumption while maintaining test validity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of operational data from multiple manufacturing locations before generating testing scripts. By pre-processing and analyzing real-world data patterns, the system can create comprehensive test cases that capture location-specific variations in a single execution, eliminating the need for numerous repeated experiments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If testing scripts are created manually, then the system complexity remains low, but error rates increase and test quality decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of testing scriptsVSAvoidcomplexity of script generation system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service capabilities where the testing script generation process automatically analyzes operational data, identifies test requirements, and generates scripts without manual intervention. This automated self-service approach eliminates human errors associated with manual script creation while maintaining system accessibility through user-friendly interfaces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor test execution results and use this information to refine and improve future testing script generation. By analyzing outcomes from virtual and physical experiments, the system learns from past performance and automatically adjusts script generation parameters to improve reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If experiments are designed to be location-specific, then they can address local conditions, but they require numerous repetitions across different locations consuming significant time and resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplicability of testing scripts across locationsVSAvoidtime required for experiment repetitions
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system generates universal testing scripts that can be executed across multiple manufacturing locations by incorporating location-specific operational patterns into a single standardized script framework. These scripts are designed to adapt to different local conditions while maintaining a consistent execution structure, allowing one script to serve multiple locations simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from physical dimension experimentation to virtual dimension experimentation by executing tests in virtualized environments first. This dimensional shift allows comprehensive testing to be performed digitally before physical execution, reducing the need for repeated physical experiments across different locations and significantly reducing time and resource consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Measurement precision

If numerous repeated experiments are performed to achieve statistically significant results, then comprehensive data can be collected, but resource consumption and time requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestatistical significance of test resultsVSAvoidefficiency of experiment execution
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic execution of testing scripts across virtual and physical environments in a structured cycle. By systematically rotating through different script executions in predetermined intervals, the system efficiently collects statistically significant data without requiring continuous or excessive repetition, optimizing the balance between data quality and resource utilization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS11914504B1Performing physical experiments based on automatically-generated testing scripts
Publication Date: 2024.02.27 STARBUCKS CORPORATION
  • US11914504B1 patent drawing
  • US11914504B1 patent drawing
  • US11914504B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Physical experiments can be performed based on automatically-generated testing scripts according to some examples described herein. For example, a system can generate a sample set based on demand data collected from a group of manufacturing locations. The system can also generate a graphical user interface that includes graphical options through which a user can select settings for a testing script to be used in a physical test environment. The system can receive the settings from the user through the graphical user interface. The system can then generate the testing script based on the sample set and the settings, and provide the testing script for use in executing a physical experiment in the physical test environment.