Automated Throttle Adjustment for Plastic Preform Forming

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing plastic container forming devices face challenges in maintaining consistent quality due to manual adjustments of throttle devices during type changes, leading to potential errors and increased downtimes.

Innovation Solution

An automated system for adjusting throttle devices, utilizing a central control and drive mechanisms to automatically change the throttle cross-sections without manual intervention, ensuring accurate settings across all forming stations during process changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual adjustment of throttle devices is used during type changes, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to potential human error and inconsistent quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of throttle adjustmentVSAvoidquality consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically adjusts throttle devices based on pre-stored optimal settings for different container types. The control unit retrieves and applies the correct throttle cross-section automatically during type changes, eliminating the need for manual intervention and ensuring consistent quality without human error.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Optimal throttle settings for different container types are pre-calculated and stored in the control unit before production. When a type change is detected, the system automatically retrieves the pre-stored settings and applies them immediately, eliminating the need for manual adjustment during the changeover process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Device complexity

If manual adjustment of throttle devices is used during type changes, then device complexity is reduced, but loss of time increases due to manual intervention and potential errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of adjustment systemVSAvoiddowntime during type change
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control system automatically manages throttle adjustments during type changes without requiring operator intervention. The system detects the type change, retrieves the appropriate settings, and applies them automatically, significantly reducing downtime while the added automation complexity is justified by the productivity gains.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

All throttle settings for different container types are pre-programmed into the control unit. During type changes, the system automatically switches between pre-configured settings, eliminating the time-consuming manual adjustment process and reducing changeover downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If automated throttle adjustment is implemented, then reliability is improved by eliminating human error, but device complexity increases due to automation systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality consistencyVSAvoidcomplexity of adjustment system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit automatically retrieves and applies pre-stored throttle settings based on container type detection. This self-service approach ensures consistent quality by eliminating manual adjustment errors, while the automation complexity is managed through software-based control rather than complex mechanical systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical adjustment with an automated control system that uses sensors, processors, and actuators. This substitution increases reliability by eliminating human error, while the complexity is concentrated in the control software rather than the mechanical adjustment mechanism itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Productivity

If automated throttle adjustment is implemented, then productivity is improved by reducing downtime, but device complexity increases due to automation mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidcomplexity of adjustment system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

All throttle settings for different container types are pre-programmed into the control unit before production begins. During type changes, the system automatically retrieves and applies the correct pre-configured settings, enabling rapid changeovers and maximizing productivity without requiring complex real-time calculation or adjustment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces time-consuming manual mechanical adjustment with an automated electronic control system. This substitution reduces changeover downtime and increases productivity, while the complexity is concentrated in the control software and sensors rather than complex mechanical adjustment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution eliminates the risk of human error and reduces downtime by enabling seamless and precise adjustments of throttle devices, ensuring consistent quality in plastic container production across multiple forming stations.

Implementation Method 1

the drive (80) is suitable and intended to rotate the transport carrier (22)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRotation:

Implementation Method 2

a first compressed air reservoir (32) which is suitable and intended to store and/or provide compressed air under a first predetermined pressure and a second compressed air reservoir (34) which is suitable and intended to store compressed air under a second predetermined pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 3

heated plastic preforms are placed into blow molds and expanded into plastic bottles within these molds by exposure to a gaseous medium

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal expansion: Thermal Expansion

Data Source

PatentEP4406723A1Device and method for reforming plastic preforms into plastic containers with automated throttle adjustment
Publication Date: 2024.07.31 KRONES AG
  • EP4406723A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4406723A1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4406723A1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

Device for forming plastic preforms (10) into plastic containers, with a transport device (2) which transports the plastic preforms (10) along a predetermined transport path, wherein the transport device (2) has a transport carrier (22) on which a plurality of forming stations (20) for forming the plastic preforms (10) are located, wherein these forming stations each have supply devices (84) which supply the plastic preforms with a flowable and in particular gaseous medium for their expansion, and wherein the device (1) has at least a first compressed air reservoir (32) which is suitable and intended for storing compressed air at a first predetermined pressure, and a second compressed air reservoir which is suitable and intended forto store compressed air at a second predetermined pressure (p2) and each forming station (20) has a valve arrangement (4) with a plurality of valve devices (52, 54) to apply the at least two pressures to the plastic preforms and wherein the forming stations each have at least one throttling device (6) which is suitable and intended to throttle the volume flow of the gaseous medium to the plastic preforms (10), characterized in that the throttling device (6) is automatically adjustable.