Automated Videography Subject Framing Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current video communication systems are not adequately optimized for dynamic residential environments, lacking in user interface improvements, image capture technology, and privacy management, which hinders seamless and contextual video capture and transmission in unstructured, informal settings.

Innovation Solution

An automated videography system that determines the current shot framing of subjects based on their movement and adjusts camera settings to ensure proper framing, using a combination of wide and narrow field of view cameras, and incorporates a contextual interface to manage privacy and adapt to changing environments during video communication events.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If automated videography systems use fixed camera framing, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to dynamic residential environments deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecamera system complexityVSAvoidadaptability to dynamic environments
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic camera control by continuously monitoring subject motion and automatically adjusting framing parameters. The camera transitions from static to dynamic operation, adapting field of view and subject positioning in real-time based on detected motion patterns, thereby resolving the contradiction between fixed simplicity and dynamic adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback mechanisms where motion detection outputs directly influence camera framing adjustments. The closed-loop control continuously monitors subject movement and feeds this information back to the camera control system, enabling automatic adaptation without increasing operational complexity for the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If manual framing control is used, then ease of operation is improved, but productivity in capturing dynamic events deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser control simplicityVSAvoidvideo capture efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically detecting subject motion and adjusting its own framing without requiring manual user intervention. The camera system serves itself by implementing autonomous tracking and reframing, thereby maintaining ease of operation while dramatically improving productivity in capturing dynamic residential events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple cameras are deployed to cover all angles, then adaptability to dynamic environments is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage of dynamic eventsVSAvoidcamera system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the video capture task into motion detection and camera control functions. By separating these functions and using a single camera equipped with intelligent control, the system achieves multi-angle adaptability through software-based scene analysis rather than through multiple physical cameras, thereby reducing device complexity while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8237771B2Automated videography based communications
Publication Date: 2012.08.07 MONUMENT PEAK VENTURES LLC
  • US8237771B2 patent drawing
  • US8237771B2 patent drawing
  • US8237771B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for framing subjects captured on video includes receiving video of a subject and determining a current shot framing of the subject. A magnitude and a direction of movement of the subject is determined, relative to the current framing and a level of motion threshold. The subject movement is analyzed relative to the determined magnitude, direction of subject movement, and the current framing, to determine that the subject is properly framed by the current shot framing or whether modifications of the current shot framing are required to capture the moving subject, or to determine a new shot selection and new shot framing. The camera re-frames the subject if the subject is determined not to be properly framed, in accordance with the determined modifications of the current shot framing, the new shot selection and new shot framing. Video images are provided to a remote viewer.