Automated Welding Defect Detection Using Radiography Image Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for detecting and characterizing welding defects in industrial components, such as pipes, are inefficient and prone to human error, as they rely on manual analysis of radiography images, making it difficult to timely and accurately identify critical defects, especially in insulated pipes where corrosion and erosion can occur.

Innovation Solution

An automated system that processes radiography images to extract defect information, using a learning model-based recommendation engine to generate recommendations for defect characterization, including size, location, and shape analysis, and automatically triggers repair instructions for critical defects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual analysis of radiography images is used to detect welding defects, then human operators can identify defects, but the process is inefficient and prone to human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoidinspection efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical analysis with an automated image processing system that uses algorithms to detect and characterize welding defects. The system processes radiography images through multiple stages including noise filtering, edge detection, and defect classification, eliminating human error while maintaining high inspection speeds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-characterization of defects by automatically measuring defect dimensions, calculating area reductions, and classifying defect types without human intervention. The automated measurement tools and characterization algorithms enable the system to independently complete the entire inspection workflow

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If manual analysis methods are used, then inspection can be performed, but it is difficult to timely and accurately identify critical defects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect characterization accuracyVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary processing of radiography images by applying noise filters and enhancement algorithms before defect detection. This preliminary action prepares the images for more accurate and faster defect identification, ensuring that critical defects are not missed while reducing the time required for detailed analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Automated measurement tools replace manual measurement processes, providing precise defect characterization including area reduction calculations and dimensional measurements. The system rapidly processes multiple images to identify critical defects, significantly reducing inspection time while improving measurement precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If automated processing is implemented, then inspection speed and accuracy improve, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated inspection system is divided into distinct functional modules: image acquisition, noise filtering, edge detection, defect characterization, and reporting. Each module performs a specific function, making the overall complex system manageable through modular design and enabling independent optimization of each component

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system is designed to handle multiple defect types and inspection scenarios using a unified platform. The same core algorithms can detect various welding defects including porosity, cracks, and incomplete fusion, reducing the need for multiple specialized systems while maintaining high productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system significantly increases the accuracy and reproducibility of defect detection, enabling timely and efficient identification of critical defects, reducing the risk of structural failures in industrial components by providing automated repair recommendations.

Implementation Method 1

The imaging device includes a radiographic source, a radiographic detector

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray: X-Ray

Data Source

PatentUS20240281959A1Detection and characterization of welding defects
Publication Date: 2024.08.22 BAKER HUGHES CO
  • US20240281959A1 patent drawing
  • US20240281959A1 patent drawing
  • US20240281959A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for generating a recommendation based on welding defects. The method includes receiving, from an imaging device, an inspection image of a target object, determining an inspection thickness of the target object based on the inspection image, converting into a multilevel thresholded thickness map based on a particular sensitivity, determining a defect of the target object based on the inspection thickness, quantifying and characterizing the defect, determining a critical level of the defect of the target object by comparing a parameter of the defect to a critical threshold and generating a recommendation based on the critical level.