Automated Wellbore Drilling With Adaptive RPM and WOB Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The drilling of wellbores encounters challenges due to abrupt transitions between lithologies with significant differences in physical characteristics, leading to variations in drilling speed and potential damage to drilling equipment.

Innovation Solution

A method for automated drilling that involves setting drilling parameter targets for RPM and WOB, monitoring real-time drilling parameters, and updating these targets when a controlling parameter exceeds a threshold window, thereby adapting to changes in rock hardness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If drilling parameters are kept constant during wellbore drilling, then operational simplicity is maintained, but equipment damage risk increases when encountering lithology transitions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling parameter managementVSAvoidequipment safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts drilling parameters (WOB, RPM, torque) in real-time based on detected lithology transitions and stringer conditions. The controller continuously monitors drilling parameters and automatically modifies them to match current formation conditions, transitioning from static constant parameters to dynamic adaptive parameters, thereby maintaining equipment safety while simplifying operator intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements closed-loop feedback by continuously monitoring drilling parameters (ROP, torque, horsepower, vibration) and comparing them against threshold values. When deviations indicating stringer entry are detected, the system automatically adjusts drilling parameters and continues monitoring to ensure parameters remain within safe operating ranges, creating a self-regulating control system that enhances equipment safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If drilling parameters are frequently adjusted to adapt to lithology changes, then equipment protection is improved, but operational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment protectionVSAvoidparameter control system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-adjustment by automatically detecting lithology transitions through monitoring of drilling parameters and autonomously modifying WOB, RPM, and torque settings without requiring operator intervention. The controller serves itself by implementing the full cycle of detection, decision-making, and parameter adjustment, thereby protecting equipment while avoiding the complexity of manual control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes drilling parameters (weight on bit, rotational speed, torque) in response to detected lithology transitions and stringer conditions. By systematically varying these parameters based on real-time feedback from vibration sensors and drilling performance data, the system adapts to formation changes while maintaining a manageable control structure through predefined adjustment protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If real-time monitoring of drilling parameters is implemented, then lithology transition detection is improved, but system complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelithology detection accuracyVSAvoidmonitoring system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and isolates specific critical parameters (vibration, torque, horsepower, ROP) from the overall drilling data stream that are most indicative of lithology transitions and stringer conditions. By focusing monitoring efforts on these key indicators rather than analyzing all possible drilling parameters, the system achieves accurate lithology detection while minimizing system complexity and data processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system monitors drilling parameters continuously but only triggers parameter adjustments when readings exceed predefined threshold values or show significant deviations from baseline conditions. This partial action approach—monitoring all parameters but acting only when necessary—maintains high detection accuracy while reducing the complexity of continuous active control and minimizing unnecessary system responses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12345149B2Methods and systems for performing automated drilling of a wellbore
Publication Date: 2025.07.01 PASON SYST
  • US12345149B2 patent drawing
  • US12345149B2 patent drawing
  • US12345149B2 patent drawing

AI summary

There are described methods, systems, and techniques for performing automated drilling of a wellbore. The wellbore is drilled according to one or more drilling parameter targets associated with one or more corresponding drilling parameters. A controlling drilling parameter of the one or more drilling parameters is determined to be outside a threshold window. In response to determining that a stringer has been encountered, one or more controlled drilling parameter targets of the one or more drilling parameter targets are updated. The controlled drilling parameter targets comprise a revolutions per minute (RPM) target and weight-on-bit (WOB) target.