Automated Wood Splitter with Sensor-Controlled Feeding and Cutting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wood splitters rely on manual operation, leading to operator-dependent speed and reliability, with potential for faults and reduced efficiency.

Innovation Solution

An automated wood splitter device with sensors and a control circuit that synchronizes log feeding, cutting, and splitting, using mechanisms like conveyor belts, transfer sensors, and splitting sensors to ensure precise and efficient cutting and splitting of wood logs into uniform pieces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If manual operation is used for wood splitting, then the device complexity is reduced, but the productivity and reliability become operator-dependent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidoperating speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control circuit automatically controls the feeding mechanism, cutting mechanism, and splitting mechanism based on sensor inputs, enabling the system to operate autonomously without continuous manual intervention. The system serves itself by making automated decisions about when to feed logs, when to cut, and when to split based on detected conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical operation is replaced with an automated control system that uses sensors to detect log presence and position, and a control circuit to automatically coordinate the feeding, cutting, and splitting mechanisms. This substitution of manual mechanical control with automated sensor-based control increases productivity while managing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Device complexity

If manual operation is used for wood splitting, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability decreases due to operator dependency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidoperational reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Sensors detect the presence and position of logs and wood blocks, providing feedback to the control circuit. The control circuit uses this feedback to automatically adjust operations, ensuring reliable execution of cutting and splitting tasks without operator error. The feedback loop ensures the system responds appropriately to actual conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Manual operational decisions are replaced with automated control based on sensor feedback. The control circuit reliably coordinates the feeding, cutting, and splitting mechanisms based on detected conditions, eliminating operator dependency and improving operational reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If automated control is implemented, then the productivity increases, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating speedVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated system is divided into distinct functional modules: a feeding mechanism for transporting logs, a cutting mechanism with its own sensor and control, and a splitting mechanism with its own sensor and control. Each module operates semi-independently under coordinated control, which manages overall system complexity while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control circuit serves multiple functions by coordinating the feeding, cutting, and splitting mechanisms. The system handles multiple operations (feeding, cutting, splitting) through a single integrated control system, which increases productivity while managing complexity through functional integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If automated control is implemented, then the reliability increases, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational reliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Sensors provide continuous feedback about log presence, cutting completion, and splitting status to the control circuit. This feedback enables reliable automated coordination of all mechanisms, ensuring operations are executed correctly without operator intervention. The feedback system manages complexity by providing necessary information for reliable control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically monitors and adjusts its own operations based on sensor inputs. The control circuit self-regulates the feeding, cutting, and splitting processes without external intervention, improving reliability while managing complexity through autonomous operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10464149B2Cutting and splitting device
Publication Date: 2019.11.05 REIKALEVY
  • US10464149B2 patent drawing
  • US10464149B2 patent drawing
  • US10464149B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A feed sensor detects location of a wood log to be moved with a feed mechanism in relation to a predetermined point in a device. A control circuit controls a feed mechanism to feed the log for a preset length on the basis of the location of the log detected by the feed sensor. The control circuit controls the cutting mechanism to cut a wood block from a log longer than the predetermined length when the feed mechanism has fed the log for the preset length and a splitting mechanism to split the wood block cut from the log.