Automated Wood Product Stacking via Software-Driven Bin Designation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for stacking engineered wood products are inefficient and pose ergonomic and safety concerns due to manual handling and cumbersome crane systems, particularly in the outfeed process of saw lines.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method for automated stacking of engineered wood products using a sawing system with software-driven bin designation and automated transport conveyor, allowing for precise placement and nesting of wood products into designated bins, reducing manual intervention and enhancing safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual handling systems are used for stacking engineered wood products, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity is lowered and ergonomic safety concerns arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing rateVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical handling with an automated mechanical system consisting of a conveyor belt, robotic arm, and control unit. The conveyor belt transports products automatically, the robotic arm performs stacking operations, and the control unit coordinates the entire process, eliminating manual labor while significantly increasing processing speed and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service operation where the automated stacking system performs all stacking operations without human intervention. The control unit automatically receives product information, determines optimal stacking positions, and executes the stacking sequence, allowing the system to serve itself and eliminate the need for manual handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If automated stacking systems are implemented, then productivity increases, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing rateVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic arm is designed with multi-functionality to perform various stacking operations including picking, placing, and adjusting products in different positions. This universal component can handle multiple product types and stacking configurations, reducing the need for multiple specialized devices and thereby managing system complexity while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit acts as an intermediary between the conveyor belt and robotic arm, coordinating their operations and managing the complexity of the automated system. It processes product information, determines stacking sequences, and controls both components, simplifying the overall system architecture by centralizing control functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If manual handling is used, then device complexity is low, but ergonomic and safety hazards increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical handling with an automated mechanical system consisting of a conveyor belt, robotic arm, and control unit. The conveyor belt transports products automatically, the robotic arm performs stacking operations, and the control unit coordinates the entire process, eliminating manual labor while significantly increasing processing speed and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service operation where the automated stacking system performs all stacking operations without human intervention. The control unit automatically receives product information, determines optimal stacking positions, and executes the stacking sequence, allowing the system to serve itself and eliminate the need for manual handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Speed

If crane systems are used for transport, then handling capability is sufficient, but speed and efficiency are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransport speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical handling with an automated mechanical system consisting of a conveyor belt, robotic arm, and control unit. The conveyor belt transports products automatically, the robotic arm performs stacking operations, and the control unit coordinates the entire process, eliminating manual labor while significantly increasing processing speed and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS7974731B2Method for automated stacking of wood products
Publication Date: 2011.07.05 WEYERHAEUSER NR CO
  • US7974731B2 patent drawing
  • US7974731B2 patent drawing
  • US7974731B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure relates to a computer-implemented method for stacking wood products. In some embodiments, the disclosure the steps of designing at least two types of engineered wood products via a software application; producing the at least two types of engineered wood products based on the designs utilizing a saw in conjunction with the software application; designating, via the software application, at least two bins to hold the at least two different types of engineered wood products; selecting a first bin for depositing a first type of engineered wood product; selecting a second bin for depositing a second type of engineered wood product; automatically placing the first type of engineered wood product into the first bin; and automatically placing the second type of engineered wood product into the second bin. The at least two types of engineered wood products are at least two of: panels, I-joists, headers and dimensional lumber.