Automatic Alerting for Aerial Vehicle Target Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Human operators must continuously monitor imagery from aerial vehicles to track targets, which is inefficient and limits their ability to perform other tasks, as they need to manually assess target behavior and ensure the target remains in view.

Innovation Solution

A system that automatically infers significant target actions, such as sudden stops or changes in direction, by calculating a track metric and alerting the operator, allowing for automated tracking and classification of target behavior.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If human operators continuously monitor imagery to track targets, then target tracking reliability is improved, but operator productivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetarget tracking reliabilityVSAvoidoperator productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by implementing automated target tracking and behavior analysis algorithms that independently monitor imagery streams, calculate track metrics, and detect significant events without requiring continuous human intervention. The automated system serves itself by maintaining target tracking while freeing operators for other tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

An automated analysis system acts as an intermediary between the imagery stream and the operator, processing visual data, calculating track metrics, and filtering information to generate only significant alerts. This intermediary layer maintains tracking reliability while reducing operator workload by handling routine monitoring functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If automated tracking system is implemented, then operator productivity is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator productivityVSAvoidtarget behavior assessment precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes parameters by calculating multiple track metrics (position, velocity, acceleration, orientation) and their time derivatives to objectively quantify target behavior. These parameter changes enable precise automated detection of significant events while maintaining measurement accuracy through mathematical analysis of imagery data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of human visual monitoring with an automated computer-based analysis system that uses algorithms to process imagery, calculate track metrics, and detect events. This substitution maintains or improves measurement precision while dramatically increasing operator productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If continuous monitoring is performed, then target detection precision is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetarget detection precisionVSAvoidoperator time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic action by continuously calculating track metrics and monitoring target behavior at regular intervals, enabling precise detection of significant events. The automated periodic analysis maintains detection precision while freeing operator time by handling continuous monitoring automatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-calculating track metrics and establishing baseline target behavior patterns before significant events occur. This preliminary analysis enables the system to quickly detect and alert operators about important changes, maintaining detection precision while reducing the time operators need to spend on routine monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8255153B2Automatic alerting method and system for aerial vehicle target tracking
Publication Date: 2012.08.28 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US8255153B2 patent drawing
  • US8255153B2 patent drawing
  • US8255153B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This invention provides a system and method for automatically inferring when a target that is being tracked by an aerial vehicle is doing something significant (e.g. stopping suddenly, changing direction quickly or getting out of track view), and consequently alerting an operator. The alerting system also provides a classification of what the target is doing. It frees the operator from continuously monitoring the imagery stream so the operator can perform other tasks.