3D Load Profiling for Variable Containment in Stretch Wrapping Machines

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional wrapping machines struggle to ensure consistent and adequate containment force for loads with non-standard shapes or uneven topography, leading to potential product damage during transit due to insufficient or excessive packaging material use.

Innovation Solution

Implementing automatic load profiling using sensors to determine density and weight parameters, enabling precise control of wrapping parameters such as wrap force and layer thickness, and activating specialized top layer containment operations for non-standard loads.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional wrapping machines use manual control parameters for wrap force and layer distribution, then operator flexibility is maintained, but containment force consistency across loads with varied topography deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainment force consistencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary scanning of the load to create a three-dimensional profile before wrapping begins. This advance knowledge of the load's topography, corners, and edges enables the control system to pre-calculate and apply appropriate wrap force variations throughout the wrapping process, ensuring consistent containment force without requiring complex real-time adjustments during wrapping

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical control of wrap force with an automated optical sensing and computational control system. Sensors scan the load and a controller automatically adjusts wrap parameters based on the scanned profile, substituting human operator control with an automated system that consistently applies optimal containment force across varied load topographies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If excessive packaging material is applied to ensure adequate containment, then load stability during transit is improved, but material waste and wrapping time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload stabilityVSAvoidpackaging material waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different wrap forces and layer distributions to different regions of the load based on the scanned profile. Areas requiring enhanced containment receive additional material and force, while stable regions receive minimal necessary coverage. This localized quality approach ensures load stability without uniformly excessive material application, reducing overall waste

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The control system dynamically adjusts wrapping parameters such as wrap force, layer count, and material tension based on the scanned load profile. By changing these parameters locally according to actual load characteristics rather than applying fixed parameters, the system achieves adequate containment with optimized material usage, avoiding both excessive and insufficient application

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If the packaging material width is significantly less than the load height with standard spiral wrapping, then the wrapping process is simple, but uneven distribution of packaging material results in weak portions that compromise overall load integrity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewrapping process simplicityVSAvoidload integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static, uniform wrap parameters to dynamic, variable wrap parameters that adapt to the load's three-dimensional profile. The wrap force, layer distribution, and material tension are continuously adjusted during the wrapping process based on real-time positional data from the scanned profile, ensuring even material distribution and consistent containment across the entire load surface

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from the scanned load profile to continuously adjust wrapping parameters. The controller compares the actual load topography against the desired wrap pattern and modifies wrap force and layer placement accordingly, ensuring even material distribution and eliminating weak portions that would compromise load integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP4223653B1Stretch wrapping machine with automatic load profiling
Publication Date: 2025.09.10 LANTECH COM LLC
  • EP4223653B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4223653B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4223653B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a method of controlling a load wrapping apparatus (110) of the type configured to wrap a load (110) on a load support (118) with packaging material (108) dispensed from a packaging material dispenser (106) through relative rotation between the packaging material dispenser (106) and the load support, the method comprising sensing a plurality of points on a plurality of surfaces (736, 738) of the load (110) using one or more sensors (720) directed at the load (110), wherein the one or more sensors (720) includes a digital camera, a range imaging sensor or a three-dimensional scanning sensor.