Automatic cooking machine having a blender

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Restaurants and beverage stores face challenges with labor-intensive ingredient preparation, leading to staff fatigue, accidents, and food waste due to the need for early preparation and frequent replacement of perishable items, which existing technologies fail to adequately address.

Innovation Solution

An automatic cooking machine with a control interface, heater, hopper, cooking pot, strainer, and blender, capable of automatically controlling ingredient quantity and cooking time, featuring a blocking element and driving mechanism to manage ingredient dispensing and blending, reducing human intervention and minimizing food waste.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If ingredients are cooked in advance to fulfill orders after business hours, then productivity is improved, but staff fatigue and accidents increase due to early preparation work

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder fulfillment capabilityVSAvoidstaff safety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by enabling ingredients to be cooked automatically in advance before business hours begin. The system allows users to pre-set cooking schedules, and the automatic cooking machine executes the cooking process without human intervention, thereby improving productivity while eliminating the need for staff to work early and reducing fatigue and accidents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service through automatic cooking execution. Once the cooking parameters and schedule are set, the machine autonomously manages the entire cooking process including heating, timing, and ingredient processing, freeing staff from manual preparation work and allowing the system to serve itself during off-hours.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If staff work longer hours to handle preparation and cooking, then productivity is improved, but food waste increases due to cooking fails and ingredient spoilage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooking throughputVSAvoidfood waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms through precise control systems that monitor cooking parameters such as temperature, time, and ingredient quantity. The system automatically adjusts cooking conditions based on pre-set parameters and provides real-time status information, ensuring consistent cooking quality and preventing cooking failures that lead to food waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

By enabling pre-cooking and scheduled cooking operations, the system prepares ingredients in advance according to predicted demand. This reduces the need for last-minute cooking and minimizes ingredient spoilage, as the automatic system can maintain optimal storage and cooking conditions without human error.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual ingredient preparation is performed, then adaptability to different orders is improved, but labor costs and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder customization capabilityVSAvoidsystem operational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements universality by designing a multi-functional automatic cooking machine that can handle various types of ingredients and cooking methods through a unified system. The machine accepts different ingredient inputs via the hopper and feeding tube system, and can execute multiple cooking programs, thereby maintaining adaptability to different orders while reducing the need for multiple separate devices or complex manual procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical preparation operations with automated mechanisms. The hopper, feeding tube, and automatic dispensing system substitute for manual ingredient handling, while the controlled heating and timing mechanisms replace manual cooking supervision, thereby reducing operational complexity while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Productivity

If ingredients are kept for extended periods after cooking, then productivity is improved by reducing preparation frequency, but food quality and safety deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepreparation frequency reductionVSAvoidfood quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system optimizes preliminary action by cooking ingredients in smaller, more frequent batches based on predicted demand patterns. This ensures that ingredients are prepared close to the time of service, maintaining freshness and quality while still reducing the need for last-minute manual preparation. The automatic scheduling system coordinates cooking cycles to match order patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The automatic cooking machine efficiently manages ingredient preparation, reducing staff burden, minimizing waste, and ensuring consistent cooking quality by automating the cooking process, thereby improving operational efficiency and reducing labor costs.

Implementation Method 1

a heater, arranged on the base

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 2

a blender, comprising: two cantilever arms, respectively arranged at two opposite sides of a top portion of the blender; multiple blending arms, respectively extending outwards from a main body of the blender

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical mixing: Stirring

Implementation Method 3

a strainer, arranged to be capable of being placed in the cooking pot to receive ingredients, wherein the strainer is provided with one or more holders, a bottom and sidewalls of the strainer are provided with multiple filter pores

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFiltration: Filter (physical)

Data Source

PatentUS12035841B2Automatic cooking machine having a blender
Publication Date: 2024.07.16 BOTRISTA INC
  • US12035841B2 patent drawing
  • US12035841B2 patent drawing
  • US12035841B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An automatic cooking machine includes: an upper portion provided with a connection port thereon; a control interface arranged to operably generate control commands based on a user's manipulations to control operation of the automatic cooking machine; a base; a heater arranged on the base; a supporting portion coupled between the upper portion and the base, and arranged to support the upper portion; a hopper for receiving materials and having a hollow feeding tube, wherein the feeding tube is detachably inserted into the connection port; a cooking pot capable of being heated on the heater; and a strainer capable of being placed in the cooking pot and receiving materials. The automatic cooking machine further comprises: a blender, comprising: two cantilever arms, multiple blending arms, a ring-shaped flange, and a positioning pillar.