Automatic Descent Planning for Supersonic Flight Restrictions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Supersonic flight poses challenges due to certification limitations and the need to manage sonic booms, making it difficult to determine and execute an automated descent while avoiding populated areas and weather conditions.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for automatic descent mode that determines a descent trigger condition, generates a descent plan including supersonic-to-subsonic transitions, and provides actuator instructions to control the vehicle, while considering clearance data to avoid populated areas, weather, and supersonic flight restrictions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If a vehicle performs supersonic flight, then high speed capability is achieved, but certification limitations and sonic boom restrictions are imposed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupersonic speedVSAvoidflight operation flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically transitions between supersonic and subsonic flight modes based on real-time conditions. The automated descent process adjusts flight regime adaptively, switching from supersonic to subsonic flight when approaching populated areas or restricted zones, thereby resolving the contradiction between maintaining high speed and adapting to operational constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes flight parameters (speed, altitude, Mach number) to transition between supersonic and subsonic regimes. By modifying these parameters automatically during descent, the vehicle can maintain performance while complying with certification limitations and avoiding sonic booms over restricted areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If automated descent is performed from supersonic flight, then efficient descent is achieved, but sonic booms may affect populated areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedescent efficiencyVSAvoidsonic boom impact
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary planning of the descent trajectory to identify restricted zones and populated areas before executing the descent. By pre-calculating the descent path and identifying where subsonic transition should occur, the system ensures efficient descent while avoiding sonic boom impacts on populated areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system converts the potentially harmful sonic boom effect into a beneficial operational feature by using it as a constraint to guide descent planning. The automated system strategically transitions to subsonic flight to direct sonic booms away from populated areas, thereby transforming a harmful effect into a controlled operational parameter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Ease of operation

If manual control is used for descent, then flexibility in decision-making is maintained, but automation and efficiency are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepilot control flexibilityVSAvoidautomated descent capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automated descent planning and execution independently, gathering necessary data from onboard systems and external sources, generating the descent plan, and controlling the vehicle without continuous pilot intervention. This self-service capability maintains operational flexibility while achieving high automation and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors flight parameters, clearance data, and environmental conditions during descent, using this feedback to adjust the descent plan in real-time. This feedback mechanism ensures the automated system can adapt to changing conditions while maintaining efficient automated operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11604480B2Methods and systems for automatic descent mode
Publication Date: 2023.03.14 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US11604480B2 patent drawing
  • US11604480B2 patent drawing
  • US11604480B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are methods, systems, and non-transitory computer-readable medium for controlling an automatic descent of a vehicle. For instance, the method may include: determining whether a descent trigger condition is present; and in response to determining the descent trigger condition is present, performing an automatic descent process. The automatic descent process may include: obtaining clearance data from an on-board system of the vehicle; generating a descent plan based on the clearance data, the descent plan including a supersonic-to-subsonic transition and/or a supersonic-descent to a target altitude; and generating actuator instructions to a control the vehicle to descend to the target altitude based on the descent plan.