Automatic Driving Assistance for Obstacle-Based Remote Intervention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automatic-driving systems for mobile bodies, such as tractors and forklifts, face challenges in efficiently navigating and operating in environments with obstacles, leading to increased workload for human operators due to complex obstacle avoidance requirements.

Innovation Solution

An automatic-driving assisting apparatus that includes a working-information obtaining unit, an obstacle state obtaining unit, an obstacle state determination unit, and an assist requesting unit. This system determines the level of an obstacle state and requests assistance accordingly, allowing for flexible operation between automatic driving, remote operation, remote driving, and manual operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automatic driving is implemented to avoid obstacles, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases due to complicated setting requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of obstacle avoidance operationVSAvoidsetting complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mobile body performs self-diagnosis of obstacle avoidance capabilities by automatically evaluating its own operational status and environment. The system assesses whether it can autonomously handle obstacles without external assistance, reducing the need for complex manual settings and configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors obstacle states and automatically adjusts its operation mode based on real-time conditions. When obstacles are detected, the system evaluates the situation and requests appropriate levels of assistance (remote operation, remote driving, or worker dispatch) based on its capability assessment, creating a closed-loop feedback system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If remote monitoring is added to continue automatic driving, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuation of automatic drivingVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The assistance system is divided into distinct levels (remote operation, remote driving, worker dispatch) based on obstacle severity. This segmentation allows the system to activate only the necessary monitoring and control functions for each situation, avoiding the need for a constantly complex active system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the level of remote monitoring and assistance based on real-time obstacle assessment. The monitoring intensity and control involvement change according to the obstacle state, transitioning from full automatic driving to various levels of remote assistance as needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If manual operation is requested for complex obstacles, then reliability is improved, but loss of time increases due to worker dispatch

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle avoidance successVSAvoiddispatch response time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system preliminarily assesses obstacle states and prepares appropriate response protocols in advance. When obstacles are detected, the system has pre-established decision criteria ready to immediately determine the appropriate assistance level, eliminating delays in assessment and response planning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system acts as an intermediary that automatically mediates between obstacle detection and appropriate response selection. It evaluates obstacle characteristics and automatically selects the most suitable assistance level (remote operation, remote driving, or worker dispatch), reducing the time needed for human judgment and decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250189980A1Automatic-driving assisting apparatus, automatic-driving assisting system, monitoring apparatus, and automatic-driving assisting method for mobile body
Publication Date: 2025.06.12 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP
  • US20250189980A1 patent drawing
  • US20250189980A1 patent drawing
  • US20250189980A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An automatic-driving assisting apparatus comprises a working-information obtainer that obtains a target position and a command for working, an obstacle state obtainer that obtains an obstacle state hindering moving to a target position and working, an obstacle state determiner that determines a level of an obstacle state, and an assist requester that makes an assist request, when a level is either a second level at which an automatic driving is continued under monitoring by a remote-monitoring person, a third level at which driving of a mobile body is performed through remote driving, or a fourth level at which dispatch of a dispatch worker for performing manual operation is requested.