Automatic Firearm Testing Apparatus with Magazine Bank

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual endurance testing of firearms is limited by human operator constraints, including frequency, cost, and health risks, and cannot efficiently test multiple firearms due to shape and size variations.

Innovation Solution

An automatic firing apparatus using hydraulic, electrical, or pneumatic actuators to initiate and control the firing process, manage magazine loading and release, and rotate a magazine bank to accommodate different firearm types, with a microcontroller coordinating these actions for continuous operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual endurance testing is performed by human operators, then the testing process can be executed, but the testing frequency is limited and below satisfactory levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting frequencyVSAvoidoperator capability limitation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical operation of firearms by human operators with an automated mechanical system comprising actuators, robotic arms, and control mechanisms. This substitution enables continuous high-frequency firing tests without human intervention, directly resolving the contradiction between testing frequency and operator capability limitations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The automated testing system is designed to operate autonomously without requiring human operators during the testing process. The system self-manages the firing sequence, magazine changes, and data collection, thereby eliminating the inherent limitations of human operators while maintaining continuous testing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple firearms with differing shapes and sizes are tested, then versatility is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefirearm type accommodationVSAvoidsystem configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamically adjustable components including movable firearm holders, adjustable positioning mechanisms, and programmable robotic arms that can adapt their configuration based on the specific firearm being tested. This dynamic adaptability allows the system to handle various firearm shapes and sizes without requiring multiple specialized fixtures, thereby managing complexity while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The testing apparatus is designed with universal components that can accommodate multiple firearm types through programmable control and adjustable mechanical elements. A single multi-functional system replaces the need for multiple specialized testing devices, achieving versatility without proportionally increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If continuous firing tests are performed, then endurance capacity is accurately determined, but the human operator is exposed to negative health effects from exhaust

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveendurance test accuracyVSAvoidoperator health exposure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the human operator from the testing environment by implementing fully automated firing and testing mechanisms. The robotic system performs all firing operations and endurance testing without human presence in the immediate vicinity of the firearm exhaust, completely eliminating health exposure risks while maintaining test accuracy through automated data collection and analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Productivity

If manual testing is performed, then the testing process can proceed, but the cost of testing increases due to operator payment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting efficiencyVSAvoidtesting cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces human operators with automated mechanical systems for firearm testing. This substitution eliminates the recurring cost of human operator payment while maintaining or improving testing efficiency through continuous automated operation, directly addressing the contradiction between productivity and testing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS9903677B2Automatic firing apparatus and method
Publication Date: 2018.02.27 UNITED ARAB EMIRATES UNIVERSITY
  • US9903677B2 patent drawing
  • US9903677B2 patent drawing
  • US9903677B2 patent drawing

AI summary

There is provided an automatic firing apparatus, and a method for operating the automatic firing apparatus, the apparatus comprising a trigger actuator for automatically firing bullets contained in a magazine of a firearm; a magazine release actuator for releasing an empty magazine from the firearm; a magazine bank for storing a bullet magazine inside the firearm; and a magazine loading actuator for loading a new magazine inside the firearm from the magazine bank. There is further provided a magazine bank apparatus for use with a firearm comprising a magazine bank base having a plurality of slots adapted to receive and store bullet magazines; and a magazine load actuator adapted to be automatically triggered for loading a bullet magazine among the stored bullet magazines inside the firearm.