Automatic Landing Gear Bay Door Closing Under Takeoff Delay

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The movement of landing gear and its bay door in aircraft during take-off causes drag and increases workload for pilots, particularly in situations like one engine inoperative (OEI), leading to delayed retraction and increased drag, which affects aircraft performance.

Innovation Solution

An aircraft system with a controller that automatically initiates the closing of the landing gear bay door based on predetermined criteria, such as in-flight status or delay in receiving a retraction command, to minimize drag and reduce pilot workload.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the landing gear bay door is manually controlled by the pilot during take-off, then the pilot has full control over the retraction timing, but the workload increases and response time may be delayed in critical situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepilot workloadVSAvoidretraction timing
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service operation by automatically controlling the landing gear bay door retraction based on flight parameters. The controller monitors climb rate, altitude, and engine status, then autonomously initiates door closing without pilot intervention, reducing workload while ensuring timely execution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback control by continuously monitoring flight parameters (climb rate, altitude, engine status) and using this information to determine the optimal moment for door retraction. The controller adjusts the retraction timing based on real-time feedback from flight conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the landing gear and bay door remain extended during take-off, then safety is maintained for ground operations, but aircraft drag increases and performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveground operation safetyVSAvoidaircraft performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by automatically initiating the bay door closing sequence based on predetermined flight criteria (climb rate threshold, altitude threshold). This ensures the door is retracted at the optimal time for performance while maintaining safety margins through conservative threshold settings

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses parameter changes in flight conditions (climb rate, altitude, engine status) as triggers for door retraction. When parameters indicate the aircraft has safely established climb, the system transitions the door from open to closed position, optimizing performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If automatic door closing is initiated, then drag is reduced and performance improves, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaircraft performanceVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller is designed with multi-functionality, serving both as the automatic door control system and as part of the existing flight management system. By reusing existing sensors and flight data infrastructure, the patent minimizes additional system complexity while achieving automatic door retraction functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the automatic door control functionality with the existing flight management and engine control systems. The controller integrates door retraction logic with climb rate monitoring and engine status detection, combining multiple functions into a unified control architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Reliability

If the bay door is opened early during take-off, then the landing gear can be retracted, but drag increases during the critical climb phase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelanding gear retractionVSAvoidclimb rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic control by adjusting the door retraction timing based on real-time flight conditions. Rather than using a fixed timeline, the controller continuously evaluates climb rate and altitude to determine the optimal retraction moment, adapting to varying take-off performance scenarios

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12404011B2Aircraft system
Publication Date: 2025.09.02 AIRBUS OPERATIONS LTD
  • US12404011B2 patent drawing
  • US12404011B2 patent drawing
  • US12404011B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An aircraft system for an aircraft is disclosed including a controller. The controller is configured, during a take-off procedure, to initiate automatic closing of a landing gear bay door of the aircraft from an open position towards a closed position, on the basis of a determination that a predetermined door-closing criterion has been met and a command to retract a landing gear has not been received, the landing gear being arranged to retract into a landing gear bay to be at least partially covered by the landing gear bay door when the landing gear bay door is in the closed position.