Automatic Light Arrangement for Medical 3D Visualization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for light arrangement in medical visualization are manual, time-consuming, and often result in images with strong shadows that hide important details, failing to optimally illuminate regions of interest.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for automatic light arrangement that determines the optimal placement of artificial light sources based on depth information and spatial information about regions of interest, using a virtual camera, to ensure shadows are below a predefined threshold and prioritize arrangements based on photography guidelines.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual light arrangement methods are used, then lighting parameters can be adjusted with technical and aesthetic knowledge, but the process is time-consuming and requires expert knowledge

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight arrangement processVSAvoidtime for light setup
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically determines optimal light source arrangements by analyzing the 3D medical image data and regions of interest itself, without requiring manual intervention. The computer executes algorithms that autonomously evaluate multiple lighting configurations and select the optimal arrangement based on shadow quality metrics and anatomical structure visibility requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically adjusts lighting parameters including light source positions, orientations, intensities, and types based on the analyzed 3D image data. By dynamically changing these parameters according to the specific anatomical structures and regions of interest, the system optimizes illumination without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Illumination intensity

If conventional three-point lighting setup is used, then well-balanced images are generated, but strong shadows can hide important details of the data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight balanceVSAvoiddetails in shadow areas
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different lighting strategies to different regions of the 3D medical image based on their specific characteristics. For regions of interest, it optimizes lighting to minimize shadows and maximize visibility, while other areas may use different lighting configurations. This localized approach ensures that critical anatomical structures are always properly illuminated without compromising overall image balance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The lighting configuration is dynamically adjusted based on the specific 3D image data and identified regions of interest. Rather than using a fixed three-point lighting setup, the system continuously evaluates and modifies light source positions, intensities, and types to adapt to the varying geometric and radiological characteristics of different anatomical structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If automatic light arrangement is implemented, then time-consuming manual adjustment is eliminated, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight setup efficiencyVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system integrates multiple functions into a single automated light arrangement module: 3D image data analysis, region of interest identification, shadow quality evaluation, and optimal lighting configuration determination. This multi-functional approach consolidates what would otherwise require separate manual operations into one unified automated process, managing complexity through functional integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback mechanisms where the quality of shadows and visibility of anatomical structures are continuously evaluated based on the current lighting configuration. This evaluation feedback drives iterative optimization of light source parameters, allowing the system to automatically adjust and improve lighting arrangements without manual intervention while maintaining manageable complexity through closed-loop control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP4057233B1System and method for automatic light arrangement for medical visualization
Publication Date: 2025.10.22 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • EP4057233B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4057233B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4057233B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

The invention describes a method for automatic light arrangement for medical visualization, comprising the steps: - providing a medical 3D image (D), - providing spatial information about a region of interest (R) in this 3D-image (D) and spatial information about a virtual camera (C), - determining a plurality of possible arrangements for light sources (L) by using depth information based on the 3D image (DI) together with the spatial information about the region of interest (R) in this image and the spatial information about the virtual camera (C), wherein valid arrangements are those where shadows (S) on the region of interest (R) are below a predefined threshold, and/or wherein the determination or arrangements is based on a number of predefined perceptual metrics applied specifically to the regions of interest, - prioritizing the determined arrangements, - choosing the arrangement with the best prioritization. The invention further describes a respective system, a related control device and a related medical imaging system.