Automatic Valve Check Flow for Fast Fire Suppressant Release

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Fire suppression systems face delays and inefficiencies in responding to electrical fires, as water-based systems can spread fires and pneumatic systems require detection of pressure loss before deploying agents, while existing automatic valves suffer from cross-contamination and pressure loss issues.

Innovation Solution

An automatic valve design featuring a piston that seals under pneumatic pressure but opens to allow fire suppression agents to flow when pressure is removed, incorporating a check valve to prevent cross-contamination and minimize pressure loss, and a threaded connection for easy assembly and servicing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If water-based sprinkler systems are used for fire suppression, then localised fires can be effectively doused, but electrical fires may spread further and response time is delayed due to heat detection requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire suppression effectivenessVSAvoidfire spread risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the state of the suppression medium from liquid water to pressurised gas (nitrogen or carbon dioxide), which can be rapidly discharged without the delay of heat detection and without the harmful effects of water on electrical fires. The parameter change from liquid to gas phase enables immediate response and eliminates conductivity risks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-charges cylinders with pressurised fire suppression agent and maintains pneumatic pressure ready to discharge. When activation occurs, the agent is immediately available for discharge without requiring heat buildup or phase change, providing preliminary preparation that eliminates response delay.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If pneumatic systems with separate detection and discharge tubes are used, then fire suppression can be deployed over broader areas, but response time is diminished by the delay to detect pressure loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage areaVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the detection and discharge functions into a single integrated valve assembly. The pneumatic pressure that maintains valve closure also serves as the activation mechanism - when pressure is applied, the valve opens immediately and discharge begins without separate detection delay. This combining of functions eliminates the time loss associated with separate pressure loss detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Pneumatic pressure acts as an intermediary that simultaneously controls valve closure during normal operation and triggers immediate opening upon activation. The pneumatic system serves as both the sealing mechanism and the activation signal, providing a direct coupling between detection and discharge that eliminates intermediate detection delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If existing automatic valves are used in fire suppression systems, then fire suppression agents can be delivered to protected areas, but cross-contamination of medium occurs and pressure loss increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire suppression agent deliveryVSAvoidpressure loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and eliminates the problematic internal channel through the piston that caused cross-contamination and pressure loss in prior designs. By removing this channel entirely and replacing it with a direct discharge path from the cylinder through the valve opening, the system eliminates the source of medium contamination and pressure leakage while maintaining effective agent delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enables quick and reliable automatic deployment of fire suppression agents, reducing response time and leakage, while maintaining a secure and efficient operation in hostile environments.

Implementation Method 1

pneumatic pressure is applied to the piston

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPneumatic pressure: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

overcoming the pressure differential that is provided by the pneumatic pressure acting on the piston

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 3

a check valve positioned within the channel such that fluid can enter the check valve in a first longitudinal direction but not in a second longitudinal direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOne-way flow: Valve

Data Source

PatentUS11547886B2Automatic valve
Publication Date: 2023.01.10 REACTON FIRE SUPPRESSION LIMITED
  • US11547886B2 patent drawing
  • US11547886B2 patent drawing
  • US11547886B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An automatic valve includes a body configured to receive a piston axially therein, the piston being movable within the body between a first axial position in which the piston is configured to seal a valve opening when pneumatic pressure is applied to the piston and a second axial position in which the piston is configured to be withdrawn from the valve opening such that a fire suppression agent can enter the valve body through the valve opening, wherein the piston includes a channel longitudinally therethrough and a check valve positioned within the channel such that fluid can enter the check valve in a first longitudinal direction but not in a second longitudinal direction.