Common Automation Controller Configuration via Graphical Dependency Rules

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The configuration of controllers for building automation systems, especially in large commercial and industrial facilities, is cumbersome, inflexible, and prone to errors due to the need for numerous variants of hardware and software to address different environments and uses.

Innovation Solution

A method for configuring a common automation system controller using a library of application types and graphical representation, where user-selectable elements are displayed and configured based on dependency rules, allowing for dynamic binding and preloading of graphical user interfaces, reducing the number of unique hardware variants and field configurations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If numerous variants of hardware and software are used to address different environments and uses, then the controller can be adapted to various building automation system requirements, but the configuration process becomes cumbersome, inflexible, and error-prone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to various environments and usesVSAvoidconfiguration process ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal controller platform that can perform multiple functions across different building automation environments. Instead of creating separate hardware variants for different applications (HVAC, lighting, security), a single controller design is used that can be configured through software to handle various system requirements. This universal approach eliminates the need for numerous hardware variants while maintaining adaptability to different environments and uses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The configuration process allows dynamic changing of controller parameters through software settings rather than requiring different hardware configurations. Users can modify operational parameters, communication protocols, and system behaviors through a configuration interface, enabling the same hardware to adapt to different building automation requirements without physical changes or reprogramming of fixed-function devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If numerous variants of hardware and software are used to address different environments and uses, then specific control requirements can be met, but the number of hardware and software variants increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespecific control capabilityVSAvoidnumber of hardware and software variants
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a universal controller architecture that consolidates multiple specialized controllers into a single platform. This universal design maintains the ability to meet specific control requirements for different building systems (HVAC, lighting, access control) while reducing the total number of hardware variants from many specialized models to one configurable platform, thereby decreasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges multiple specialized controller functions into a single unified controller platform. By combining what were previously separate hardware variants for different building automation functions into one integrated system, the patent reduces the number of components while maintaining all necessary control capabilities through software configuration and modular application types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If traditional configuration methods are used with numerous hardware variants, then specific system requirements can be addressed, but errors increase and costs rise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem requirement fulfillmentVSAvoidconfiguration accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses parameter-based configuration where system requirements are fulfilled by changing software parameters rather than selecting different hardware variants. This approach maintains the ability to address specific system requirements while reducing configuration errors, as parameter changes are less error-prone than hardware selection and installation. The configuration process becomes more precise and reliable through standardized parameter settings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10785049B2Configuring a common automation system controller
Publication Date: 2020.09.22 SIEMENS SCHWEIZ AG
  • US10785049B2 patent drawing
  • US10785049B2 patent drawing
  • US10785049B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A common automation system controller configured using a graphical approach for use in a building automation system is provided. There is an increasing demand for flexible and adaptable room or building automation applications with an easy and intuitive way for application configuration. In pre-engineering as well as during installation and commissioning, the application configuration for preloaded or loadable device needs to be easily changeable and can be used for operating and/or monitoring.