Automation Logic Binding for Motor Control Center Configuration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current industrial automation systems lack an efficient method for device logic binding, leading to time-consuming and error-prone manual configurations in motor control centers, which can result in system failures or improper device performance.

Innovation Solution

An industrial automation computing apparatus that automates device logic binding by obtaining a list of devices, identifying their logical representations, and updating configuration parameters, enabling streamlined integration and reduced errors through a series of steps including device acquisition, system recognition, configuration acquisition, device linking, and system enablement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual configuration of devices and parameters is used for logic binding, then each device can be individually configured, but the process becomes time-consuming and error-prone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration accuracyVSAvoidconfiguration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic self-configuration by retrieving device parameters autonomously from manufacturer databases using device identifiers, eliminating the need for manual parameter entry and reducing configuration errors while saving time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Device parameters are pre-stored in manufacturer databases before deployment, allowing the system to automatically retrieve and configure devices without manual intervention during the binding process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If individual device assignment and parameterization is performed manually, then complete system coverage is achieved, but the complexity and error rate increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidconfiguration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The manual mechanical process of configuring each device parameter individually is replaced with an automated electronic system that retrieves parameters from databases using device identifiers, reducing configuration complexity while maintaining complete system coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

A database system acts as an intermediary between device identifiers and configuration parameters, automatically resolving the mapping and reducing the complexity of manual parameter assignment while ensuring complete and accurate device integration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If automated device binding is implemented, then configuration time is reduced, but manual verification and system representation updates are still required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration speedVSAvoidprocess steps
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system combines multiple configuration steps into a single automated process that simultaneously retrieves parameters, updates logical representations, and configures device binding, reducing configuration time while consolidating process steps rather than increasing them

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11300940B1Application code manager and intellicenter integration
Publication Date: 2022.04.12 ROCKWELL AUTOMATION TECH INC
  • US11300940B1 patent drawing
  • US11300940B1 patent drawing
  • US11300940B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments of the present technology generally relate to industrial automation device configurations and programmable logic. More specifically, some embodiments relate to a method of integrating industrial automation device configurations and application logic in industrial environments. To reduce time and errors, an automated method enables industrial enterprises, employers, and other users to obtain a list of devices in an automation process comprising at least one device and a logical representation of the device. In order to configure the device to function optimally in the industrial environment, a system representation of the automation process comprising corresponding input/output configurations for each device in the list may be obtained. After identifying further device configuration parameters associated with the device and the system representation, the logical representation may be updated and enabled in a programmable controller, such as a programmable logic controller or programmable automation controller, to control the devices properly in the automation process.