Industrial Automation Maintenance Prioritization via Edge-Cloud Reporting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Industrial automation systems face challenges in efficiently managing and maintaining equipment due to the lack of effective communication and data sharing between devices, leading to suboptimal operations and maintenance processes.

Innovation Solution

A tri-partite communication paradigm that enables information exchange between industrial automation equipment, computing devices, and cloud-based systems, allowing for real-time data analysis and generation of reports and recommendations for efficient maintenance and operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If a tri-partite communication paradigm is implemented to enable real-time data exchange between equipment, computing devices, and cloud-based systems, then information sharing and operational efficiency are improved, but device complexity and system integration requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation sharingVSAvoidsystem integration
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into three distinct segments: industrial automation equipment at the edge, computing devices in the middle layer, and cloud-based systems at the core. Each segment handles specific functions independently while communicating through standardized protocols, reducing the complexity burden on any single component while enabling comprehensive information sharing across the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Computing devices serve as intermediaries between the industrial automation equipment and cloud-based systems. These intermediaries process and pre-analyze data locally before transmitting to the cloud, and translate cloud commands into equipment-specific protocols, thereby managing system complexity while maintaining seamless information flow across all layers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If real-time data analysis and reporting are implemented to provide actionable insights for maintenance, then operational efficiency and equipment life expectancy are improved, but data processing requirements and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary data processing and analysis at the edge computing level before data is transmitted to the cloud. Maintenance recommendations and actionable insights are generated in advance based on real-time equipment data, reducing the need for intensive cloud computing resources while maintaining high operational efficiency through proactive maintenance scheduling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements selective data transmission where only critical equipment parameters and anomaly detections are sent to the cloud for detailed analysis. Routine operations are monitored locally with minimal computational overhead, while excessive computational resources are allocated only when needed for complex maintenance optimization and predictive analytics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11061389B2Systems and methods for maintaining equipment in an industrial automation environment
Publication Date: 2021.07.13 ROCKWELL AUTOMATION TECH INC
  • US11061389B2 patent drawing
  • US11061389B2 patent drawing
  • US11061389B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for generating a report regarding prioritizations of industrial automation devices in an industrial system may include determining a first score for each of the industrial automation devices. The first score represents a relative importance of each of the industrial automation devices. The method may also include determining a second score for each of one or more parts of each of the industrial automation devices. The second score represents a relative importance of each of the parts with respect to each other. The method may also include generating the report comprising the parts, the industrial automation devices, the first score for each of the industrial automation devices, the second score for each of the parts, or any combination thereof, wherein the report is organized according to the first score, the second score, or based on a combination of the first score and the second score.