Automotive Handle Unit Resolving Shaft Dislocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional handle units for automotive trunk boards face increased part complexity and costs due to the use of separate metallic pins, and risk dislocation of rotational shafts under strong pulling forces, leading to potential operational failures.

Innovation Solution

A handle unit design where rotational shafts are integrally formed on the handle, with support and holding walls that adjust to prevent dislocation, and are molded from resin with flat bearing surfaces to enhance accuracy and reduce wear, incorporating a torsion coil spring for easy assembly and operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If rotational shafts are formed integrally on a handle to reduce part complexity, then the number of parts is reduced and assembly is simplified, but the rotational shafts may be dislocated from bearings under strong pulling forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of partsVSAvoidrotational shaft retention
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The handle is divided into functional segments: support walls that provide structural framework, rotational shafts that enable rotation, and arm portions that transmit force. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function while maintaining overall integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The bearing is designed with a cavity that receives the rotational shaft, and the support wall is positioned to contact the arm portion before the rotational shaft can be dislocated from the bearing. This preemptive structural arrangement cushions against the harmful effect of dislocation under strong pulling forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

2Ease of manufacture

If a single metallic pin is used to connect handle and main body, then assembly is simple, but the number of parts increases and product costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly simplicityVSAvoidnumber of parts
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The rotational shafts are formed integrally with the handle as a single molded piece, merging what would traditionally be separate components (handle body and rotational shafts) into one unified structure. This eliminates the need for additional fasteners or assembly steps while reducing part count.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The integrally formed handle serves multiple functions: it provides the gripping surface, contains the rotational shafts for movement, and integrates the support walls for structural stability. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate components and simplifies the overall design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If rotational shafts are used instead of metallic pins, then part complexity is reduced, but arm portions deflect under strong pulling forces causing rotational shaft dislocation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepart complexityVSAvoidresistance to deflection
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The support walls are strategically positioned to provide localized reinforcement at critical points where the arm portions connect to the handle body. This local strengthening prevents excessive deflection under load without requiring the entire handle structure to be oversized or overly robust.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The handle is molded from resin material that combines flexibility for rotational movement with sufficient strength to resist deflection under pulling forces. The integral molding process creates a composite structure that optimizes both strength and flexibility in different regions of the handle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design reduces part complexity, prevents rotational shaft dislocation under strong forces, and ensures reliable operation with reduced wear and noise, while maintaining cost-effectiveness and ease of assembly.

Implementation Method 1

incorporating a torsion coil spring for easy assembly and operation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTorsion spring: Torsion Spring

Data Source

PatentUS7819445B2Handle unit
Publication Date: 2010.10.26 PIOLAX INC
  • US7819445B2 patent drawing
  • US7819445B2 patent drawing
  • US7819445B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to an aspect of the present invention, there is provided a handle unit including: a main body including: a pair of bearings; and a pair of holding walls separated from the pair of the bearings; a handle including: a pair of support walls; and a pair of rotational shafts projecting outward from the pair of support walls to be engaged with the pair of the bearings, wherein the handle is rotatable between a stored position and a operating position, wherein the support walls are formed to not face the holding walls when the handle is in the stored position, and formed to face the holding walls and contact the holding walls by being deflected when the handle is in the operating position.