Automotive Structural Member With L-Shaped Corner Reinforcement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current structural members for automobiles do not adequately improve collision safety performance while reducing weight, as they lack high properties in three-point bending tests.

Innovation Solution

A structural member is designed with a press-formed steel sheet and an L-shaped reinforcing member, where the first plate-like portion is fixed to the vertical wall portion using welding, adhesive bonding, brazing, or riveting, and the second plate-like portion protrudes outward, creating a rounded corner shape to inhibit deformation and enhance collision resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional structural members are used, then manufacturing is simple, but collision safety performance is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision safety performanceVSAvoidresistance to deformation in three-point bending test
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The structural member is divided into multiple functional segments: a press-formed product with integrated reinforcing ribs and separate corner reinforcement members. This segmentation allows each part to be optimized independently - the press-formed product provides overall structural integrity while the corner reinforcement members specifically address weak points at corners, thereby improving collision safety performance without requiring complete redesign of the entire structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Reinforcing ribs are pre-formed as integral parts of the press-formed product during the manufacturing process, and corner reinforcement members are positioned and secured before final assembly. This preliminary action ensures that reinforcement structures are already in place to resist deformation during three-point bending tests, improving collision safety performance without adding complex post-manufacturing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If reinforcing structures are added to improve collision safety, then strength increases, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision safety performanceVSAvoidweight of structural member
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of uniformly reinforcing the entire structural member, reinforcing ribs are strategically placed in specific locations where stress concentration occurs during three-point bending tests, and corner reinforcement members are positioned only at corner locations. This local quality approach provides necessary strength improvements for collision safety while minimizing the addition of material, thereby controlling weight increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The structural member combines different material forms and structures - a press-formed product with integrated ribs and separate corner reinforcement members - to create a composite structure. This composite approach allows optimization of each component's material usage, providing high collision safety performance while maintaining weight efficiency through targeted reinforcement rather than uniform material distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Strength

If corner reinforcement is added, then resistance to deformation improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to deformationVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The corner reinforcement members are merged with the press-formed product through integration at corner locations, where the reinforcement members are positioned to work together with the existing structure. This merging approach provides improved resistance to deformation at critical corner points while avoiding the complexity of completely separate reinforcement systems, as the corner reinforcements are designed to complement rather than complicate the existing press-formed structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The structural member achieves improved collision safety performance and reduced weight by effectively resisting deformation and absorbing energy in three-point bending tests, demonstrating higher properties per unit mass.

Implementation Method 1

The first plate-like portion is fixed, by at least one kind selected from the group consisting of welding, adhesive bonding, brazing, riveting, and friction stir joining, to one of the vertical wall portions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWelding: Welding

Implementation Method 2

The first plate-like portion is fixed, by at least one kind selected from the group consisting of welding, adhesive bonding, brazing, riveting, and friction stir joining, to one of the vertical wall portions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesive bonding: Adhesive

Implementation Method 3

The first plate-like portion is fixed, by at least one kind selected from the group consisting of welding, adhesive bonding, brazing, riveting, and friction stir joining, to one of the vertical wall portions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBrazing: Brazing

Data Source

PatentEP3611058B9Structural member for automobiles
Publication Date: 2024.11.20 NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION
  • EP3611058B9 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3611058B9 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3611058B9 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

A structural member (100) for an automobile to be disclosed includes a press-formed product (110) formed from one steel sheet and a reinforcing member (120) fixed to the press-formed product (110). The press-formed product (110) includes two vertical wall portions (111) and a top plate portion (112) linking the two vertical wall portions (111). The reinforcing member (120) is a member which has an L-shaped cross section and includes a first plate-like portion (121) and a second plate-like portion (122). The first plate-like portion (121) is fixed to one of the vertical wall portions (111) such that the second plate-like portion (122) protrudes toward an outward direction from the vertical wall portion (111) side along the top plate portion (112). According to such a structural member, high properties in a three-point bending test are achieved.