Autonegotiation Rate Limiting for Downstream Capacity Mismatch

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional autonegotiation processes often result in data transmission rate mismatches between networks with different protocols, leading to inefficient use of bandwidth and potential data loss, especially when converting between Ethernet and SONET networks.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that dynamically adjust data transfer rates by determining the provisioned rate of the secondary network and sending a configuration message to limit the transfer rate to match the downstream capacity, ensuring data is transmitted at the maximum rate supported by the secondary network, thereby preventing excess data loss and optimizing bandwidth utilization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If autonegotiation selects the highest performance transmission mode supported by both devices, then data transfer rate between the two devices is maximized, but the transmission parameters may be incompatible with downstream networks causing data loss and inefficient network performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transfer rateVSAvoidnetwork compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of downstream network capabilities before finalizing the data transfer rate negotiation. The second network device detects the capabilities of the third network device and determines the maximum supported data transfer rate in advance, then communicates this information to the first network device through an extended autonegotiation process, preventing incompatibility issues before they occur

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where the second network device provides information about downstream network capabilities back to the first network device. This feedback loop allows the upstream devices to adjust their negotiation parameters based on actual downstream constraints, ensuring compatibility while maximizing throughput

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the data transfer rate is limited to match downstream capacity, then network compatibility and data loss prevention are improved, but bandwidth utilization between the first and second devices is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata loss preventionVSAvoidbandwidth utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the data transfer rate based on real-time network conditions and capability information. Rather than using a static rate limit, the autonegotiation process continuously exchanges capability information between devices, allowing the system to adapt to changing network conditions and maximize bandwidth utilization within safe operational parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the negotiation parameters by extending the autonegotiation process to include downstream capability information. Instead of negotiating only based on direct link capabilities, the system incorporates additional parameters about downstream network constraints, allowing optimization of the transfer rate parameter to balance compatibility and utilization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If conventional autonegotiation is used without knowledge of downstream capabilities, then the negotiation process is simple and fast, but transmission parameters may mismatch with downstream network protocols

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenegotiation processVSAvoidprotocol compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system enhances the autonegotiation process to serve multiple functions: it not only negotiates direct link capabilities but also communicates downstream network constraints and protocol requirements. This multi-functional approach allows a single negotiation process to ensure both local link optimization and downstream compatibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20240305570A1Systems and methods for enhanced autonegotiation
Publication Date: 2024.09.12 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS LLC
  • US20240305570A1 patent drawing
  • US20240305570A1 patent drawing
  • US20240305570A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An improved autonegotiation approach includes determining that a negotiated rate between a first network device and a second network device exceeds data transfer capacity over a network path downstream of the second network device. In response, a configuration message is generated and transmitted to the first network device. When received by the first network device, the configuration message causes the first network device to limit data transfer between the first network device and the second network device to no more than the downstream data transfer capacity.