Autonomous Agent Self-Assessment for Hallucination-Resistant Tool Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing machine learning systems struggle with accurately breaking down complex tasks into manageable sub-steps and may generate plausible but incorrect outputs due to over-confidence, leading to undesirable outcomes.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning powered autonomous agent system that breaks tasks into sub-steps, assesses its competency, seeks additional information when needed, and utilizes a simulation tool to improve its operation, reducing the likelihood of hallucinations by incorporating a long-term memory and database access.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the control breaks the command into sub-steps and determines competency for each sub-step, then the reliability of task execution is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of task executionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments complex tasks into smaller sub-steps and evaluates competency for each sub-step independently. This allows the control system to identify specific areas of uncertainty without requiring complete task decomposition, balancing reliability improvement with manageable complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary assessment layer between task reception and execution. This intermediary component evaluates competency for each sub-step and determines whether additional information is needed, acting as a mediator that improves reliability without requiring complete system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If the control seeks additional information when determining it is not competent to perform a sub-step, then the manufacturing precision of the output is improved, but the loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of outputVSAvoidtime loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial information seeking by only querying additional information for sub-steps where competency is uncertain. Rather than seeking complete information for all sub-steps, it selectively queries only where needed, reducing time loss while maintaining output precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system performs self-assessment of its own competency for each sub-step and autonomously determines when additional information is needed. This self-service mechanism eliminates the need for external verification of all steps, reducing time loss while maintaining precision through targeted information seeking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If the control uses machine learning to improve operation over time, then the productivity increases, but the object-generated harmful factors increase due to hallucinations

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidhallucinations
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where the control assesses its own competency outcomes and uses this information to improve future performance. By feeding back competency assessment results into the machine learning model, the system learns from its uncertainties and reduces hallucinations over time while maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary competency assessment before executing sub-steps, identifying potential hallucination risks in advance. By assessing competency beforehand and seeking additional information when uncertain, the system prevents harmful hallucinations before they occur, maintaining productivity through proactive risk mitigation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250383652A1Machine learning powered autonomous agent system for competency self-assessment and improvement
Publication Date: 2025.12.18 RTX CORP
  • US20250383652A1 patent drawing
  • US20250383652A1 patent drawing
  • US20250383652A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for controlling a tool includes a tool operable to perform tasks. A control for the tool includes processing circuitry for using machine learning to improve operation of the tool, and having access to a memory with stored data. The processing circuitry is operable to communicate with a user interface, and the user interface is operable to provide a prompt for a desired action to the control. The control is operable to break the received prompt into a plurality of sub-steps, communicate with the stored data, and make a determination as to whether the control is competent to perform each of the sub-steps. The control is operable to control the tool to perform one of the sub-steps if it has determined it is competent and to communicate to other information if it determines it is not competent to perform any others of the sub-steps. A method is also disclosed.