Multi-Axis Aircraft Upset Recovery Using Autonomous Maneuvers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current aircraft control systems struggle to effectively recover from unusual attitudes, particularly during pitch and roll upsets, which can lead to loss of control in-flight accidents due to pilot errors or system anomalies.

Innovation Solution

A processing circuit and associated control algorithms that automatically recover an aircraft from pitch high, pitch low, and roll high upsets by executing specific maneuvers such as unloading the aircraft, rolling to a select angle, adjusting throttle and speed brakes, and stabilizing the aircraft to a level flight condition.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If automated upset recovery systems are implemented, then pilot workload is reduced and recovery consistency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepilot workloadVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The upset recovery system automatically detects unusual attitudes and executes recovery maneuvers without pilot intervention. The system monitors pitch and roll angles, identifies upset conditions, and autonomously commands control surfaces to recover the aircraft, making the system self-sufficient in handling emergencies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors aircraft attitude parameters (pitch angle θ, roll angle φ) and uses this feedback to determine when upsets occur and when recovery is complete. The feedback loop ensures the system responds appropriately to changing flight conditions and confirms recovery to stabilized flight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If multi-axis recovery maneuvers are executed, then recovery effectiveness from combined upsets is improved, but control precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecovery effectivenessVSAvoidcontrol precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The recovery process is divided into distinct phases: detection of upset condition, execution of unloading maneuver, recovery to level flight, and confirmation of stabilized condition. Each phase has specific control actions and termination criteria, making the complex multi-axis recovery manageable and precise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system adapts its control commands based on the current flight state and upset severity. Control surface deflections and maneuver rates are dynamically adjusted according to the aircraft's response, allowing effective recovery from various combined pitch and roll upset conditions while maintaining control precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP4502750A1Multi-axis upset recovery system
Publication Date: 2025.02.05 ROCKWELL COLLINS INC
  • EP4502750A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4502750A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4502750A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Autonomous systems increase the robustness and safety of current aircraft and to support simplified vehicle, reduced crew, and single pilot operations. The autonomous systems aid air crews in their handling of non-normal, high workload, aircraft upset scenarios. The upset scenarios include the recovery from attitudes outside of the normal operating envelope that even the most robust automatic flight control systems currently in service today do not support.