Autonomous Asset Delivery Bot for Vehicle Loading and Handoff

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing asset delivery systems and vehicle technologies are static and limited in functionality, requiring extensive manual human intervention for loading and unloading assets, and lack autonomous components for moving assets to or from logistics vehicles to destination locations.

Innovation Solution

The integration of a logistics vehicle with asset loading components and a delivery bot, equipped with sensors for automatic guidance and a launch component that allows the delivery bot to traverse outside the vehicle, enabling autonomous movement and delivery of assets to or from storage units and delivery locations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual human intervention is used for loading and unloading assets, then operational flexibility is maintained, but labor intensity and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual operationVSAvoidloading speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service operation through the delivery bot that autonomously navigates to storage units, loads assets using its own robotic mechanisms, and delivers packages without human intervention. The bot serves itself by independently completing the entire delivery workflow from asset retrieval to final delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical operations are replaced with an automated robotic system. The delivery bot uses robotic arms, sensors, and automated navigation to substitute human hands and eyes, transforming a manually-operated mechanical process into an automated electromechanical system that increases loading speed and reduces labor intensity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Device complexity

If static shelving carts are used in carrier vehicles, then vehicle simplicity is maintained, but asset delivery functionality is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle structureVSAvoiddelivery functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static shelving carts to a dynamic delivery bot that can actively navigate, select, and deliver assets. The bot's mobility and automated operations transform the vehicle from a passive storage container into an active delivery system, enhancing functionality without significantly increasing overall vehicle complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The delivery bot serves multiple functions: it navigates autonomously, identifies and selects specific assets using sensors, loads packages onto itself, and delivers them to various destinations. This multi-functional robot replaces multiple specialized components, providing versatile delivery capabilities while maintaining reasonable system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If loading devices are made static, then device simplicity is maintained, but manual operator intervention is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloading device structureVSAvoidoperator intervention
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The loading device is integrated into the delivery bot, which autonomously performs loading operations. The bot uses its own robotic mechanisms to grasp, lift, and position assets, eliminating the need for external operators. The system serves itself by independently completing the loading function without human assistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Sensors act as intermediaries between the delivery bot and the assets, enabling the bot to detect asset locations, identify targets, and guide its loading operations. This intermediary sensing system bridges the gap between the robotic mechanism and the physical assets, automating the loading process while maintaining system simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If autonomous delivery bot is deployed, then manual labor is reduced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery efficiencyVSAvoidautonomous system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous delivery system is segmented into distinct functional modules: navigation system for movement, sensor system for detection, robotic arm for loading, and control system for coordination. By dividing the complex autonomous function into separate manageable segments, the system achieves high delivery efficiency while keeping each component relatively simple and maintainable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20240045427A1Asset delivery system
Publication Date: 2024.02.08 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE OF AMERICAN INC
  • US20240045427A1 patent drawing
  • US20240045427A1 patent drawing
  • US20240045427A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus may automatically move one or more assets to or from one or more storage units to or from a delivery bot. The apparatus and the one or more storage units and the delivery bot may be stored in a logistics vehicle. The delivery bot may be configured to deliver or pick up the one or more assets to or from one or more delivery or pickup locations that are outside of the logistics vehicle.