Autonomous Carriages for Order Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automatic order processing systems face inefficiencies due to high construction costs, increased maintenance needs, and reduced flexibility, as well as potential machine stoppages from ejector malfunctions, especially when handling diverse products with varying frequencies.

Innovation Solution

The system employs autonomous carriages with a rack/pinion mechanism and brushless motors, allowing independent movement and coordination along the machine length, with a central control unit managing carriage allocation and operation to adapt to changing product demands and handle malfunctions, eliminating the need for fixed modules and extensive cabling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If fixed ejectors are used for each storage unit, then product extraction is reliable, but construction costs increase and maintenance becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct extraction reliabilityVSAvoidnumber of ejector elements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A single carriage-mounted ejector serves multiple storage units sequentially, replacing the need for dedicated fixed ejectors at each storage unit location. The ejector performs the same function (product extraction) across different positions, reducing the total number of ejector elements while maintaining extraction reliability through controlled positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The ejector is mounted on a movable carriage that travels along the tunnel structure, transitioning from a static fixed-position system to a dynamic mobile system. This allows one ejector to service multiple storage units by positioning itself at required locations, reducing the overall number of ejectors needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If multiple moving ejectors are used, then order preparation time is reduced, but machine operation becomes more complex and positioning difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder preparation speedVSAvoidejector positioning difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the ejection function into multiple independent carriages, each capable of autonomous operation. This segmentation allows parallel processing of multiple storage units, improving order preparation speed while the modular nature simplifies control compared to a single complex positioning system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each carriage is equipped with its own motor and control systems, enabling autonomous navigation and positioning to required locations. This self-service capability reduces the complexity of centralized control and simplifies operation, as each unit independently manages its own positioning and ejection timing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If independent driving belts are used for each module, then module independence is achieved, but machine length increases and positioning accuracy decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodule independenceVSAvoidmachine length
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple carriages share a common driving belt infrastructure rather than each having separate belts. This merging of the transmission system reduces the overall machine length while maintaining module independence through the autonomous control capabilities of each carriage. The shared belt system eliminates redundant driving mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration reduces construction costs, maintains high production rates, minimizes downtime from ejector failures, and allows for flexible machine expansion and adaptation to changing product demands, while ensuring accurate and efficient order processing.

Implementation Method 1

The rack (10) is oriented in a direction according to the extension of the machine and engages with a pinion (11) connected to a brushless motor (12) mounted on the carriage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRack and pinion: Rack and Pinion

Implementation Method 2

a pinion (11) connected to a brushless motor (12) mounted on the carriage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBrushless motor: Linear Motor

Data Source

PatentEP1910192B1A commissioner machine for automatic processing of orders
Publication Date: 2012.11.07 U T I T
  • EP1910192B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1910192B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP1910192B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A machine for automated processing of orders with products (30) piled up in storage units (2), arranged in rows, includes the use of motorized carriages (7), moving autonomously and coordinated one with another, and having ejector means (4) . The carriages are moved in a coordinated way, until they are placed below the storage units containing selected products, by a control unit (20) , which cooperates with a central control unit (50) . Then, the ejector means are operated to pick up, from the storage units, the products forming the order prepared each time.