Autonomous Chemical Synthesis System for Reaction Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for predicting chemical reactivity are limited by the need for extensive experimentation and lack of accurate models, as they struggle to navigate the complex chemical space and identify reactive regions without prior knowledge, often requiring human intuition and being resource-intensive.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising an automated synthesiser, analytical unit, and control unit with a machine learning algorithm that autonomously searches organic chemical space, using real-time analytical data from NMR, IR, and mass spectrometry to generate predictive models for reaction sets, allowing for efficient exploration of reactive regions and discovery of new reactions and products.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If existing databases of chemical reactivity are used to build predictive models, then some prediction capability is achieved, but the models are not accurate because failed experiments are not captured and data is not always correct

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoiddata correctness
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs reactions autonomously without human intervention, automatically capturing both successful and failed experiments. The robotic platform conducts experiments, analyzes products, and feeds results back into the machine learning model, creating a self-improving system that progressively enhances prediction accuracy by learning from all outcomes including failures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a closed-loop feedback mechanism where experimental results (both successful and failed) are analyzed and fed back into the machine learning model. This continuous feedback allows the model to learn from actual reaction outcomes, correcting previous inaccuracies and improving prediction accuracy over time by incorporating real experimental data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If high-level quantum chemistry methods are used to calculate potential energy surfaces, then accurate reaction predictions can be made, but the calculations are fundamentally difficult and resource-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction prediction accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex quantum chemistry calculations with a machine learning approach that uses pattern recognition from experimental data. Instead of performing computationally intensive quantum mechanical calculations to map potential energy surfaces, the system trains neural networks on experimental reaction outcomes to predict reaction results, substituting mechanical computational complexity with data-driven prediction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a simplified digital representation (copy) of chemical reactions through machine learning models that capture essential reactivity patterns without requiring explicit quantum mechanical calculations. The neural network learns from experimental data to create a predictive model that replicates reaction outcomes without the computational burden of full quantum chemistry simulations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If genetic algorithms are used to explore reaction space, then the space can be explored without performing all possible reactions, but the algorithm cannot accurately predict results for combinations of inputs without reaction performance data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction space exploration efficiencyVSAvoidreaction outcome prediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning model continuously learns from actual reaction outcomes as they are performed by the robotic platform. The feedback loop ensures that the model progressively improves its prediction accuracy by incorporating real experimental data, allowing it to accurately predict reaction outcomes for combinations of inputs that have not yet been tested.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs a subset of reactions to train the machine learning model before making predictions about untested combinations. By preliminarily exploring reaction space and using the results to train predictive models, the system can then accurately predict outcomes for new reactions without having to perform all possible experiments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Measurement precision

If extensive experimentation is performed to explore chemical space, then comprehensive reaction data can be collected, but time and resources are consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereactivity data completenessVSAvoidexperimentation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning model creates a virtual representation of chemical reactivity patterns that can be queried without physical experimentation. Once trained on a comprehensive dataset, the model can predict reaction outcomes for numerous combinations instantly, providing complete reactivity data without requiring extensive physical experimentation for each prediction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs a strategically selected subset of experiments to train the machine learning model, using these preliminary results to predict outcomes for many other reactions. This preliminary action allows the system to collect comprehensive reaction data efficiently by using model predictions to guide subsequent experimentation only where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20210233620A1Machine learning
Publication Date: 2021.07.29 CHEMIFY LTD
  • US20210233620A1 patent drawing
  • US20210233620A1 patent drawing
  • US20210233620A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides a method to generate a predictive model for a reaction set, which reaction set is the sum of the reaction outcomes for a plurality of chemical inputs. Also provided is a system for generating a predictive model for a reaction set, which system may be used in the method. The system comprises a synthesiser for conducting reactions, which synthesiser is an automated synthesiser, an analytical unit for monitoring reactions performed by the synthesiser, and a control unit suitably programmed with a machine learning algorithm, for analysing analytical data from the analytical unit, and for controlling the synthesiser.