Autonomous Vehicle Collision Simulation for Severity Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current autonomous vehicle control systems lack accurate methods to assess collision severity, which is crucial for ensuring occupant safety and improving navigation in dynamic environments.

Innovation Solution

The use of simulations to determine severity scores for collisions by accounting for various characteristics such as vehicle and object sizes, velocities, and collision types, allowing for the adaptation of control systems to reduce injury risk and enhance safety protocols.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If simulations are used to determine collision severity scores, then measurement precision of collision severity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision severity assessment accuracyVSAvoidsimulation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a virtual copy of the autonomous vehicle and its environment through simulation. Instead of physically testing collision scenarios, the system generates a digital replica that mimics real-world physics and dynamics. This allows accurate severity assessment without the complexity and cost of physical testing apparatus.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The simulation environment acts as an intermediary between the autonomous vehicle controller and real-world collision testing. It provides a middle ground where collision scenarios can be safely and repeatedly tested without actual physical damage, bridging the gap between theoretical control algorithms and real-world safety validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If multiple simulation scenarios are run to validate safety, then reliability of safety validation is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety validation reliabilityVSAvoidsimulation execution time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary safety validation through extensive simulations before the autonomous vehicle is deployed or updated. By pre-testing various collision scenarios and determining severity scores in advance, the system ensures safety reliability is established beforehand, avoiding time-consuming testing after deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The simulation system dynamically adjusts scenario parameters and automatically generates multiple test cases based on identified safety concerns. Rather than running a fixed set of simulations, the system adapts its testing based on preliminary results, optimizing the balance between comprehensive validation and time efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12187322B1Severity simulation for autonomous vehicles
Publication Date: 2025.01.07 ZOOX INC
  • US12187322B1 patent drawing
  • US12187322B1 patent drawing
  • US12187322B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for determining a safety metric associated with a vehicle controller are discussed herein. The safety metric may be reflective of one or more severity scores associated with a collision simulated by simulating performance of the vehicle controller. The techniques may include determining a simulation scenario, simulating the scenario by simulating a component of an autonomous vehicle, and determining simulation data describing a collision occurring between the simulated autonomous vehicle and an object in the scenario. The simulation data is used to determine a severity score for the collision that may be used to refine the component of the autonomous vehicle system and/or validate the component for safe operation.