Autonomous Vehicle Control With Probabilistic Sensor Failure Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in reliably determining the failure probability of sensor systems and ADAS subfunction commands, which affects their ability to safely transition between manual and autonomous modes.

Innovation Solution

A probabilistic method that receives unfiltered sensor signals, determines the failure probability of the sensor system and estimation signals in real time, and calculates the failure probability of ADAS subfunction commands, including the ADAS steering torque command, to autonomously control the vehicle or request driver intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If the vehicle operates in autonomous mode using sensor signals, then automation level is improved, but reliability of control deteriorates due to potential sensor failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous mode operationVSAvoidcontrol reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a probabilistic monitoring system as an intermediary between the sensor system and autonomous control. This mediator calculates failure probabilities of sensor signals and ADAS commands, and uses these probabilities to determine whether to trust autonomous commands or request driver intervention, thus resolving the contradiction between automation and reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback by monitoring sensor signal quality and ADAS command reliability in real-time. The failure probability calculations feed back into the control decision-making process, allowing the system to dynamically adjust between autonomous operation and driver takeover based on current reliability assessments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the vehicle requests driver takeover frequently to ensure safety, then reliability is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to driver burden

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoiddriver burden
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses dynamic parameter changes by adjusting the threshold for driver takeover based on contextual factors. Instead of a fixed threshold, the system considers multiple parameters including sensor failure probabilities, environmental conditions, and driving scenarios to determine when driver intervention is necessary, thereby reducing unnecessary takeovers while maintaining safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12330678B2Probabilisic system and method for autonomous vehicle control
Publication Date: 2025.06.17 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US12330678B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for probabilistic autonomous vehicle control includes receiving a plurality of unfiltered sensor signals from a sensor system of a vehicle and determining, in real time, a failure probability of the sensor system using the unfiltered sensor signals. The method further includes determining a failure probability of a plurality of estimation signals at each time step using the failure probability of the sensor system and determining a failure probability of a plurality of Advanced Driver Assistance System (ADAS) subfunction commands using the failure probability of the plurality of estimation signals at each time step. Further, the method includes determining remedial actions for the plurality of ADAS subfunction commands based on the failure probability of the plurality of ADAS subfunction commands.