Multi-Layer Autonomous Vehicle Control for Redundant Sensor Decisions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional autonomous vehicle control systems face issues with single-point failures, requiring system overhauls for sensor upgrades and lacking redundancy, which can incapacitate the vehicle and increase processing power consumption.

Innovation Solution

A multi-layered vehicle control system architecture with independent sensor layers and data boxes, each capable of operating the vehicle independently, using different algorithms for redundancy and reducing processing power requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional single-layer autonomous vehicle control system is used, then the system structure is simple, but the system has single-point failures and lacks redundancy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the autonomous vehicle control system into multiple independent layers (first layer with first sensor system and first data box, second layer with second sensor system and second data box, etc.). Each layer can independently process sensor data and generate vehicle control decisions. This segmentation eliminates single-point failures because if one layer fails, other layers can continue operating, thereby improving reliability without requiring a complete system overhaul.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each layer in the multi-layer system has specialized algorithms and processing capabilities tailored to its specific function. The first data box uses a first algorithm to process first sensor data, while the second data box uses a second algorithm to process second sensor data. This local specialization allows each component to be optimized for its specific task, improving overall system reliability while maintaining manageable complexity through functional differentiation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If sensor upgrades are performed in a conventional single-layer system, then the system can be updated, but it requires a complete system overhaul

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor upgrade capabilityVSAvoidsystem overhaul requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent structures the control system as independent, modular layers where each layer (sensor system + data box) can be individually upgraded. The first sensor system and first data box are independent from the second sensor system and second data box. This modular segmentation allows sensor upgrades to be performed on specific layers without affecting other layers, eliminating the need for complete system overhauls and improving adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The multi-layer architecture creates a universal system framework where different sensor types and algorithms can be integrated across multiple layers. Each layer can use different algorithms (first algorithm, second algorithm, etc.) to process data from different sensors, allowing the system to accommodate various sensor upgrades and technology iterations without requiring fundamental changes to the overall system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Use of energy by moving object

If a conventional autonomous vehicle control system is used, then the system can operate the vehicle, but it consumes high processing power

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing power consumptionVSAvoidvehicle control safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the processing workload into multiple independent layers, where each data box (first data box, second data box, etc.) processes sensor data independently using its own algorithm. This segmentation distributes the computational load across multiple processors rather than concentrating it in a single high-power processor, thereby reducing overall processing power consumption while maintaining vehicle control safety through redundant processing paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each layer in the multi-layer system performs partial processing of sensor data independently, generating intermediate vehicle control decisions that are then integrated. The first data box processes first sensor data to generate a first vehicle control decision, while the second data box processes second sensor data to generate a second vehicle control decision. This partial processing approach reduces the computational burden on any single processor compared to having one system process all sensor data comprehensively, thereby reducing power consumption while maintaining safety through multiple processing paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12139167B2Multi-layer autonomous vehicle control architecture
Publication Date: 2024.11.12 COAST AUTONOMOUS INC
  • US12139167B2 patent drawing
  • US12139167B2 patent drawing
  • US12139167B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for controlling an autonomous vehicle is provided. The system may include a first sensor system including a first sensor and a first data box. The first sensor system may be configured to determine a first vehicle control decision. The system may further include a second sensor system including a second sensor and a second data box. The second sensor system may be configured to determine a second vehicle control decision. The system further includes a controller configured to receive the first vehicle control decision and the second vehicle control decision from the first sensor system and the second sensor system; determine a priority ranking for the first vehicle control decision and the second vehicle control decision; select, based on the priority ranking, a vehicle control decision from the first vehicle control decision and the second vehicle control decision; and implement, responsive to the determining, the selected vehicle control decision.