Autonomous Conversational AI Self-Configuration from Historical Logs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing Conversational AI systems require substantial human effort for configuration and ongoing maintenance, lacking the ability to autonomously learn and improve from past conversations.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous Conversational AI system (ACAI) that automatically configures itself using historical conversation logs, annotating intents, responses, and actions without human intervention, and improves over time through self-learning from user interactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If human agents manually configure and maintain Conversational AI systems, then initial setup and control are ensured, but substantial human effort and time are required for ongoing maintenance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of system configurationVSAvoidtime required for human configuration and maintenance
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-configuration by automatically inspecting past conversations, discovering intents and responses, and training its own models without requiring manual human configuration. The Conversational AI system inspects historical conversations, annotates intents and responses, and trains neural network models autonomously, eliminating the need for human agents to manually set up and maintain the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary configuration actions by automatically analyzing past conversations before deployment. It inspects historical conversation data, extracts patterns, and pre-trains the neural network models in advance, so that when the system is deployed, it already has the necessary configuration and knowledge without requiring manual setup.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If Conversational AI systems are manually configured, then initial accuracy can be controlled, but the system cannot autonomously improve over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of conversational responsesVSAvoidautonomous improvement capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously improves its accuracy by inspecting past conversations and using that feedback to retrain its neural network models. After each interaction, the system analyzes the conversation outcomes and uses this feedback to update its understanding of intents and responses, progressively improving its accuracy without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-improvement by automatically training on past conversations and updating its own models. It inspects historical conversation data, extracts learning patterns, and retrains its neural networks autonomously, enabling the system to improve its accuracy over time without requiring human configuration or external training data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of manufacture

If human agents configure the system, then initial setup is possible, but continuous maintenance and updates require ongoing human involvement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of system setupVSAvoidduration of human involvement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system eliminates ongoing human involvement by performing self-maintenance through automatic inspection of past conversations and self-training on new interaction data. It continuously updates its own models and configuration without requiring human agents to maintain or update the system, reducing human involvement to an initial one-time setup process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Measurement precision

If the system inspects all past conversations for training, then comprehensive learning is achieved, but data processing time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of learning from conversationsVSAvoidtime required for data inspection and processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by selectively processing and inspecting past conversations based on relevance and importance rather than processing every single conversation uniformly. It identifies and focuses on the most valuable conversation patterns and intents for training, achieving comprehensive learning of critical patterns while reducing overall processing time through selective attention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250238636A1Autonomous conversational ai system without any configuration by a human
Publication Date: 2025.07.24 GICRM AI LLC
  • US20250238636A1 patent drawing
  • US20250238636A1 patent drawing
  • US20250238636A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for analyzing conversation logs to identify system actions are described. Historical conversation logs are analyzed using a generative language model to identify conversation topics and subtopics, with conversations ranked by frequency and selected using normalized mean conversation embeddings. The system converts user messages and human agent responses into system actions using a transformer-based natural language processing model, generating database queries and API calls with required parameters. The system creates a graph structure representing conversation flows, identifies action nodes, determines required parameters, and validates the structure. An action configuration is generated and stored for training an autonomous conversational AI system. The system preprocesses logs to normalize data across channels, anonymizes personal information, and automatically improves performance by analyzing problematic conversations.