Autonomous Crop Spraying Control for Variable Field Conditions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional agricultural treatment methods face challenges in achieving fully automated fertilizer spraying due to varying crop types and stages within a field, leading to inefficient chemical distribution and potential crop damage from disproportionate spraying.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing machine learning algorithms, cameras, and sensors to detect spraying sections and control robot navigation and chemical dispensing, ensuring precise application of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides based on crop type and location, using autonomous navigation and closed-loop flow control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If conventional automated fertilizer spraying is implemented, then labor requirements are reduced, but chemical distribution becomes inefficient and crop damage occurs due to varying crop types and stages in different field portions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of fertilizer sprayingVSAvoidchemical distribution precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different chemical treatments to different portions of the field based on locally detected crop characteristics. The robot uses sensors and cameras to identify specific crop types and stages in each location, then adjusts chemical parameters (composition, dosage, quantity) accordingly, ensuring each area receives appropriate treatment rather than uniform spraying

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously detects crop information using sensors and cameras, processes this data through machine learning algorithms to determine optimal chemical parameters, and adjusts the spraying system in real-time. This closed-loop feedback ensures precise chemical distribution adapted to varying field conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If uniform chemical spraying is applied across the entire field, then operation simplicity is maintained, but crop damage occurs due to disproportionate chemical application on different crop types and stages

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespraying operation simplicityVSAvoidcrop damage from disproportionate spraying
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The spraying system dynamically adjusts its operation based on real-time detection of crop types and stages. The robot automatically modifies chemical composition, dosage, and flow rate according to detected crop characteristics, transforming a static uniform spraying operation into a dynamic adaptive process that prevents crop damage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes multiple chemical parameters (composition, dosage, quantity) based on detected crop conditions. Machine learning algorithms process sensor data to determine optimal parameter settings for each crop type and stage, enabling precise control over chemical application to avoid harmful effects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If traditional manual monitoring and spraying is used, then treatment precision can be maintained, but labor requirements are high and productivity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment precisionVSAvoidagricultural treatment productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The robot performs autonomous detection, analysis, and spraying operations without continuous human intervention. It uses onboard sensors and cameras to self-monitor crop conditions, processes data through embedded machine learning algorithms to self-determine optimal treatment parameters, and automatically executes spraying, thereby maintaining precision while dramatically improving productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical monitoring and spraying operations with an automated robotic system equipped with sensors, cameras, and machine learning algorithms. This substitution maintains or improves treatment precision through consistent automated detection and control while eliminating labor constraints and significantly increasing productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11980116B1System and a method for automation of agricultural treatments
Publication Date: 2024.05.14 EARTHSENSE INC
  • US11980116B1 patent drawing
  • US11980116B1 patent drawing
  • US11980116B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and a method for automation of agricultural treatments. The system receives a set of instructions for the agricultural treatment. The set of instructions may include a type of agricultural treatment, and a target location. Further, the system may determine chemical parameters including a composition, a dosage, and a quantity of a chemical required for the agricultural treatment. Further, the system may be configured to navigate the robot to the target location. Further, the system may detect a spraying section based on the type of agricultural treatment. Subsequently, the system may determine a speed of the robot, a proximity of the robot to the spraying section, and a rate of chemical flow. Further, the system may be configured to control the robot. Finally, the system may be configured to dispense the chemical using a spraying equipment.