Autonomous Device Remediation Using Failure Aggregation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing computing device deployments require human intervention for maintenance and remediation when devices fail, disrupting remote operation and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

Implement a failure aggregator and digital twin system with machine learning models to identify and prioritize impaired devices, enabling autonomous remediation and replacement or repair based on operational and performance costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If human intervention is used for device maintenance and remediation, then devices can be repaired when they fail, but remote operation integrity is disrupted and efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice operation integrityVSAvoidremote operation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables devices to self-diagnose and self-report their status through automated health checks and failure notifications. The failure aggregator automatically collects, prioritizes, and manages device failures without human intervention, allowing the system to serve itself in terms of monitoring and initial response to device impairments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The failure aggregator acts as an intermediary between devices and human operators. It collects failure data from multiple devices, prioritizes them based on impact, and manages the remediation process automatically. This intermediary layer eliminates the need for direct human intervention in routine device monitoring and failure management, maintaining operational integrity while preserving remote efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If automated failure aggregation and prioritization systems are implemented, then remote operation efficiency is maintained, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremote operation efficiencyVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The failure aggregator is designed as a universal system that can handle multiple device types, failure modes, and prioritization criteria through a single platform. It performs multiple functions including data collection, failure detection, prioritization, and remediation coordination, eliminating the need for separate specialized systems for each function and reducing overall system complexity despite the advanced capabilities provided.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12536485B2Remediating impaired devices
Publication Date: 2026.01.27 DELL PROD LP
  • US12536485B2 patent drawing
  • US12536485B2 patent drawing
  • US12536485B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for remediating impaired devices in a deployment are disclosed. The devices may be remediated by repairing or replacing the devices. Whether to repair or replace the devices may depend on the operational and performance costs of running the impaired devices in the deployment. Operational costs may include the retail price of the device and any energy requirements to run the impaired device. Performance costs may include effects of the output of the impaired device on other devices along the pathway of devices. If the integrated costs of the operational costs and performance costs outweigh the sum of the individual operational costs and performance costs, then the device may be replaced; otherwise, the device may be repaired.