Autonomous Driving Control Model Using Deep Reinforcement Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current autonomous driving systems require complex operations to determine control signals, which can be inefficient and may not optimize driving decisions in real-time.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses a trained control model, such as a Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG) network model, to directly determine control signals based on vehicle state and driving information, selecting the most appropriate signal for transmission to the vehicle's control components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a series of operations (obtaining driving information, determining driving action, planning driving path, determining control signal) is performed to determine control signals, then the autonomous driving system can make comprehensive decisions, but the system complexity and operation time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision-making comprehensivenessVSAvoidsystem operation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple sequential operations (obtaining driving information, determining driving action, planning driving path, and determining control signal) into a single integrated deep reinforcement learning model. The model directly maps driving information to control signals, eliminating the need for separate modules for each operation while maintaining comprehensive decision-making capabilities through the learned policy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a deep reinforcement learning model as an intermediary that processes driving information and directly outputs control signals. This intermediary model replaces the complex multi-step decision-making pipeline, learning the optimal mapping from sensory inputs to control actions through reinforcement learning training.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If a series of operations is performed to determine control signals, then comprehensive driving decisions can be made, but the time efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision-making comprehensivenessVSAvoidcontrol signal determination time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary training of the deep reinforcement learning model offline using extensive simulation data and real-world driving scenarios. During actual autonomous driving operation, the pre-trained model can directly infer control signals without performing the full sequence of operations, significantly reducing real-time computation time while maintaining decision quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical sequential processing system (multiple discrete operations executed in sequence) with a neural network-based parallel processing system. The deep reinforcement learning model processes driving information through parallel computational layers, enabling faster inference compared to sequential execution of multiple decision-making steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If traditional multi-step operations are used to determine control signals, then the system can handle complex driving scenarios, but the operational efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling complex driving scenariosVSAvoidautonomous driving efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental parameter of the decision-making system from a multi-step procedural approach to a direct end-to-end mapping approach using deep reinforcement learning. By training the model on diverse driving scenarios during the offline phase, it learns to handle complex situations directly through the learned policy, improving real-time efficiency without sacrificing adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11669097B2Systems and methods for autonomous driving
Publication Date: 2023.06.06 BEIJING VOYAGER TECH CO LTD
  • US11669097B2 patent drawing
  • US11669097B2 patent drawing
  • US11669097B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to systems and methods for autonomous driving. The systems may obtain driving information associated with a vehicle; determine a state of the vehicle; determine one or more candidate control signals and one or more evaluation values corresponding to the one or more candidate control signals based on the driving information and the state of the vehicle by using a trained control model; select a target control signal from the one or more candidate control signals based on the one or more evaluation values; and transmit the target control signal to a control component of the vehicle.