Autonomous Driving System Driver State Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing autonomous driving systems require drivers to maintain constant visual contact with the road, lacking the ability to actively account for the driver's state, which can lead to safety issues if the driver is distracted or not paying attention.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous driving system that evaluates surroundings and driver data using sensors, calculates lead time and reaction time, and adjusts vehicle speed and alertness levels to ensure safety, allowing the driver freedom from constant visual contact while initiating countermeasures if necessary, such as reducing speed or decelerating to an emergency stop.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If autonomous driving systems require constant visual contact with the road, then driver safety is maintained, but driver freedom and comfort are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver safetyVSAvoiddriver freedom
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors driver state through sensors (eye tracking, attention detection) and provides feedback by adjusting warnings and take-over requests based on real-time driver condition. This allows the system to maintain safety while reducing unnecessary constraints on driver freedom when the driver is attentive.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The autonomous driving system dynamically adjusts its safety requirements based on the driver's current state. When the driver is attentive, the system allows more freedom; when distracted, it increases monitoring and readiness for take-over requests. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction between constant safety monitoring and driver freedom.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the system warns the driver frequently, then driver attention is maintained, but driver comfort and trust are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver attentionVSAvoiddriver comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of continuously warning the driver (excessive action), the system applies partial warnings only when necessary based on detected driver distraction levels and critical situation assessment. This maintains driver attention while avoiding unnecessary warnings that would reduce comfort and trust.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of warning frequency based on driver state and situation criticality. When the driver is attentive and situations are non-critical, warnings are reduced or eliminated. When distraction is detected or situations become critical, warning frequency increases appropriately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If the system reduces reaction time requirements, then travel speed can be increased, but safety margins are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetravel speedVSAvoidsafety margin
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessment of driver state and situation criticality before initiating maneuvers. By evaluating driver readiness and predicting required reaction times in advance, the system can plan maneuvers that maintain adequate safety margins while optimizing travel speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system monitors its own safety margins and driver state, automatically adjusting its operation to maintain adequate safety buffers. When safety margins become too tight, the system self-corrects by reducing speed or increasing driver engagement requirements, ensuring reliability is maintained.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS9650058B2Autonomous driving system for a vehicle and method for carrying out the operation
Publication Date: 2017.05.16 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US9650058B2 patent drawing
  • US9650058B2 patent drawing
  • US9650058B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An autonomous driving system for a vehicle includes: a computer unit which evaluates surroundings-related and vehicle-related data with the aid of sensors and carries out an automatic driving operation based on the data; a lead time calculator assigned to the computer unit and determining a lead time by evaluating the surroundings-related and vehicle-related data, the lead time requiring an intervention by the driver; and a comfort time calculator assigned to the computer unit and calculating a reaction time of the driver by evaluating driver-related data, the comfort time calculator continuously comparing the lead time with the reaction time and determining therefrom a comfort time which is determined by taking the difference between the lead time and the reaction time. When the comfort time reaches zero, a countermeasure including a prewarning of the driver and/or a mode change of the driving system is initiated.