Autonomous Driving Route Specification Using Lane Marking Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing autonomous driving assistance systems struggle to accurately specify a vehicle's route at branch points without pre-set guidance routes, relying on artificially defined 'along the road' relationships rather than lane markings and connections, leading to potential misinterpretation of lane changes.

Innovation Solution

The system utilizes 'line types of lane markings' and 'connection types of lanes' to specify a planned route for the vehicle, allowing for quicker and more accurate route determination even without a pre-set guidance route, by analyzing road information and lane configurations ahead.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If the system uses artificially defined 'along the road' relationships to determine route, then the system complexity is reduced, but the route specification accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidroute specification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the route determination process into two distinct modes: one using artificial 'along the road' relationships for simple cases, and another using detailed lane marking analysis for complex branch points. This segmentation allows the system to apply the appropriate level of complexity based on the specific situation, improving overall accuracy without unnecessarily increasing system complexity in all cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from using only artificial relational definitions (one-dimensional approach) to incorporating spatial geometric information from lane markings (adding a spatial dimension). By analyzing the actual geometric relationships and connectivity of lane markings at branch points, the system achieves more accurate route specification that reflects the true physical road layout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If the system uses detailed lane marking analysis to specify route, then the route specification accuracy is improved, but the processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute specification accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic route determination strategy that adapts the level of analysis based on the complexity of the upcoming road geometry. For simple continuous roads, the system uses faster artificial relationship checks. For complex branch points, it dynamically switches to detailed lane marking analysis. This dynamic adaptation optimizes processing time while maintaining accuracy when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of analysis depth based on detected road conditions. When a branch point is detected ahead, the system increases the detail level of lane marking analysis from basic to comprehensive. This parameter change allows the system to allocate computational resources efficiently, performing detailed analysis only when necessary for accurate route specification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If the system presumes vehicle will take straight road at branch point, then the default route determination is simplified, but the reliability of route specification deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefault route determinationVSAvoidreliability of route specification
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary analysis of lane marking configurations at branch points before the vehicle reaches them. By examining the connectivity and geometry of lane markings in advance, the system can determine the actual intended route rather than presuming straight continuation. This preliminary action ensures reliable route specification while maintaining smooth operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from lane marking detection and geometric analysis to correct or adjust the default presumption of straight road continuation. When the lane marking analysis indicates a different intended route (e.g., curve connection), the system adjusts the planned route accordingly. This feedback mechanism ensures reliability by basing route decisions on actual road geometry rather than simple presumptions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10300916B2Autonomous driving assistance system, autonomous driving assistance method, and computer program
Publication Date: 2019.05.28 AISIN AW CO LTD
  • US10300916B2 patent drawing
  • US10300916B2 patent drawing
  • US10300916B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Autonomous driving assistance systems, methods, and programs obtain road information that specifies line types of lane markings and connection types of lanes and specify, when a vehicle travels with autonomous driving assistance, a planned route to be taken by the vehicle based on the road information. The systems, methods, and programs execute the autonomous driving assistance for the vehicle according to the specified planned route.