Autonomous Driving System with Driver Napping Opportunity Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current driver drowsiness alert systems do not provide a method for determining when a driver can safely take a nap or be distracted in an autonomous vehicle, nor do they suggest optimal times for napping while the vehicle is in autonomous mode, leading to potential driver fatigue and increased accident risk during complex driving scenarios.

Innovation Solution

A driving assist system that aggregates data from internet sources, road infrastructure, and driver monitoring to determine the 'Chance of Unintended Driver Interception' (CUDI) along a programmed route, allowing the driver to safely take a nap during low-risk segments and alerting them when to be ready to take control again, using a combination of cameras, non-imaging sensors, and internet connectivity to assess traffic conditions and suggest nap windows.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the vehicle operates in autonomous mode for extended periods, then driver fatigue increases and accident risk increases, but driver intervention capability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidautonomous operation duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by calculating CUDI values for upcoming route segments in advance, identifying nap opportunity zones before the vehicle reaches them. This allows the system to proactively plan driver rest periods rather than reactively responding to fatigue, maintaining safety while enabling extended autonomous operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors driver state and provides feedback through alerts when approaching nap opportunity zones or when driver intervention is required. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures the driver remains engaged when needed while allowing rest during safe periods, resolving the contradiction between autonomous duration and driver alertness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the driver is monitored continuously for alertness, then driver fatigue can be detected, but driver convenience and comfort decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver alertness monitoringVSAvoiddriver comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different monitoring intensities to different route segments based on local CUDI characteristics. During high-risk segments, monitoring is intensive and driver alertness is required. During low-risk nap opportunity zones, monitoring is relaxed and driver comfort is prioritized. This spatial variation in monitoring quality resolves the contradiction between safety and comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring system dynamically adjusts its behavior based on real-time conditions, transitioning between alert monitoring modes and relaxed nap-permissive modes. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to maintain high reliability when needed while providing driver comfort during safe periods, eliminating the need for continuous strict monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If the system provides detailed nap recommendations, then driver fatigue management improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefatigue managementVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential information needed for fatigue management - identifying nap opportunity zones based on CUDI thresholds - and presents this simplified guidance to the driver. Complex route analysis and multi-segment CUDI calculations are performed internally by the system, while the driver receives straightforward recommendations, resolving the contradiction between effective fatigue management and system simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS10906554B2Autonomous driving system
Publication Date: 2021.02.02 MAGNA ELECTRONICS INC
  • US10906554B2 patent drawing
  • US10906554B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An autonomous vehicle driving system includes a control that autonomously controls the vehicle. The control, upon receipt of a destination geographical location, controls the vehicle to travel to the destination geographical location, and wirelessly receives data pertaining to driving conditions relevant to the route being traveled by the vehicle. Responsive to the received driving conditions data, the control determines a geographic location ahead of the vehicle along the route where driving of the vehicle by an occupant of the vehicle is desired. When the vehicle is traveling along the route and toward the determined geographic location and is within a threshold time and/or distance to the determined geographic location, the control informs the occupant of distance to and/or time of travel to the determined geographic location so the occupant is prepared to take over control of the vehicle and drive the vehicle upon the vehicle reaching the determined geographic location.