Autonomous Driving Path Computation with Asymmetric Transition Curves

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing autonomous driving systems using clothoid curves for steering wheel control can cause discomfort to drivers due to sudden changes in steering wheel movement when accelerating or decelerating, as the curve lengths for acceleration and deceleration sections are typically equal, leading to inconsistent steering speeds.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous driving control device that computes driving paths with varying transition curve lengths between acceleration and deceleration sections based on speed profiles, setting the deceleration section target vehicle speed faster than the acceleration section target vehicle speed to reduce steering wheel movement discomfort and optimize path length.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If equal length transition curves are used for acceleration and deceleration sections, then the steering wheel control is simplified and symmetric, but the steering speed becomes inconsistent during acceleration and deceleration causing driver discomfort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteering wheel control consistencyVSAvoidpath computation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by setting different target vehicle speeds for the acceleration section (lower speed) and deceleration section (higher speed) of the transition curves. This asymmetric speed profile causes the transition curve lengths to differ, with the deceleration section having a shorter length. This resolves the contradiction by making the steering wheel movement characteristics consistent between acceleration and deceleration phases, eliminating driver discomfort while maintaining manageable path computation complexity through systematic speed parameter differentiation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Ease of operation

If the deceleration section target vehicle speed is set faster than the acceleration section target vehicle speed, then the steering wheel movement becomes comfortable and consistent, but the path computation becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteering wheel movement comfortVSAvoidtransition curve computation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically varying the target vehicle speed parameter between the acceleration and deceleration sections. Specifically, the deceleration section uses a higher target vehicle speed than the acceleration section, which directly changes the transition curve characteristics. This parameter change approach achieves comfortable and consistent steering wheel movement while keeping the computation methodology systematic and manageable, resolving the contradiction between operational comfort and computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Stability of the object's composition

If transition curves are used to prevent sudden steering speed changes, then steering smoothness is improved, but the driving path length increases compared to direct turning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteering speed stabilityVSAvoiddriving path length
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by implementing transition curves only in the acceleration and deceleration sections where steering speed changes occur, rather than applying them to the entire driving path. The constant speed section uses direct turning without transition curves. This selective application maintains steering speed stability during critical phases while minimizing the overall path length increase, resolving the contradiction between steering smoothness and path efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11292521B2Autonomous driving control device and autonomous driving path computation method
Publication Date: 2022.04.05 FAURECIA CLARION ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US11292521B2 patent drawing
  • US11292521B2 patent drawing
  • US11292521B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An autonomous driving control device and an autonomous driving path computation method capable of computing a driving path without extremely changing a movement of a steering wheel during autonomous driving. A parking control device computes a parking path for automatically parking a vehicle, and includes an acceleration section transition curve computing unit that computes an acceleration section transition curve based on a target steering speed set in advance and an acceleration section target vehicle speed, a deceleration section transition curve computing unit that computes a deceleration section transition curve based on the target steering speed and a deceleration target vehicle speed, and a parking path computing unit that computes a parking path using the acceleration section transition curve and the deceleration section transition curve. The parking path is computed by setting the deceleration section target vehicle speed faster than the acceleration section target vehicle speed.