Autonomous Driving Recognition Status Output for Safety Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing techniques for autonomous vehicles fail to effectively communicate whether the recognition processes necessary for safe driving are properly performed, making it difficult for evaluators to assess the vehicle's ability to conduct thorough safety checks.

Innovation Solution

An information processing method that acquires event-related information, direction information, and recognition results to determine if specific objects influencing the vehicle's driving are recognized, generating process completion information to indicate the vehicle's recognition performance, allowing evaluators to assess the safety checks performed by the autonomous vehicle.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If the autonomous vehicle performs recognition processes and driving control, then the driving automation is improved, but the transparency of recognition process to evaluators deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving automationVSAvoidtransparency of recognition process
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an information processing system as an intermediary between the autonomous vehicle's recognition system and human evaluators. This system generates and provides information about whether recognition processes have been performed in specific directions, enabling evaluators to assess the vehicle's safety checks without interfering with the automated driving operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the autonomous vehicle conducts thorough safety checks, then the reliability of autonomous driving is improved, but the complexity of monitoring recognition processes deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of autonomous drivingVSAvoidcomplexity of monitoring recognition processes
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the monitoring function into specific directional checks. Instead of requiring comprehensive monitoring of all recognition processes, the system focuses on determining whether recognition has been performed in specific directions associated with particular events, simplifying the evaluation process while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the monitoring parameter from comprehensive process verification to directional recognition verification. By focusing on whether objects are recognized in specific directions rather than verifying all internal processing steps, the system maintains reliability while reducing monitoring complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If detailed recognition process information is provided to evaluators, then the measurement precision of safety check assessment is improved, but the quantity of information to be processed deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of safety check assessmentVSAvoidquantity of information
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential information needed for evaluation - specifically, whether recognition processes have been performed in directions associated with particular events. This extracted information provides sufficient precision for safety assessment without requiring evaluators to process comprehensive detailed data about all recognition operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentEP3441839B1Information processing method and information processing system
Publication Date: 2024.05.08 PANASONIC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CORP OF AMERICA
  • EP3441839B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3441839B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3441839B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to an information processing method and system for properly presenting, to a user (U), information indicating whether autonomous driving of a vehicle (2) is properly performed or not. Event-related information is acquired, and a judgment is made as to whether a particular event is detected. When a particular event is detected, direction information indicating a first direction is acquired, and first recognition result information is acquired as to a result of a recognition process as to an object located outside a vehicle. Furthermore, a judgment is made as to whether the first recognition result information includes a result of object recognition in the first direction and as to whether existence of a specific object in the first direction is detected. In a case where it is judged that the first recognition result information indicates that object recognition in the first direction is performed and existence of a specific object in the first direction is not detected, process completion information indicating that the vehicle (2) has performed the recognition process in the first direction is generated and output.