Autonomous Driving Risk Processing for Real-Time Hazard Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in identifying and responding to risks on the road, such as pedestrian collisions, adverse weather conditions, and complex driving scenarios, due to limitations in sensor data analysis and real-time decision-making.

Innovation Solution

The system processes sensor signals to identify risks by analyzing object positions, speeds, and behaviors, and modifies its autonomous driving capabilities to navigate safely, including executing lane changes and trajectory adjustments, and generates reports on risks for remote data sources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the autonomous vehicle system enhances its sensor data analysis and real-time decision-making capabilities to identify and respond to risks more effectively, then the safety and reliability of vehicle operation is improved, but the device complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of autonomous vehicle operationVSAvoidcomplexity of sensor data analysis system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The risk processing system is divided into distinct functional modules: sensor signal reception, risk identification, autonomous capability modification, and operation updating. This segmentation allows each module to specialize in specific tasks, improving overall reliability while managing complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary risk identification and analysis before actual hazardous events occur. By continuously analyzing sensor signals and predicting potential risks in advance, the system can prepare appropriate responses, improving safety without requiring overly complex real-time reaction mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If the vehicle continuously monitors and analyzes sensor signals to identify multiple types of risks including pedestrian collisions, adverse weather, and complex driving scenarios, then the measurement precision and detection capability is improved, but the loss of processing time and computational resources increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of risk identificationVSAvoidprocessing time for sensor data analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where sensor signals are constantly analyzed, risk assessments are updated in real-time, and autonomous capabilities are dynamically adjusted. This feedback mechanism enables precise risk identification while optimizing processing efficiency through iterative refinement rather than exhaustive analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts analysis parameters and processing depth based on the current operational context and detected risk levels. When risks are low, processing is streamlined; when risks are detected, analysis precision is enhanced, balancing measurement accuracy with processing time requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If the autonomous driving capability is frequently modified in response to identified risks to ensure safe operation, then the adaptability and responsiveness of the vehicle is improved, but the stability of vehicle control and operation may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponsiveness to risk conditionsVSAvoidstability of vehicle control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous driving capability is designed to be dynamically adjustable based on risk assessments. The system modifies control parameters and driving behaviors in response to identified risks while maintaining overall system stability through controlled adaptation rather than abrupt changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Continuous feedback monitoring ensures that modifications to autonomous capabilities are made only when necessary and are reverted or adjusted when risks are mitigated. This feedback-controlled adaptation maintains both responsiveness to hazards and stability of overall vehicle operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11897460B2Risk processing for vehicles having autonomous driving capabilities
Publication Date: 2024.02.13 MOTIONAL AD LLC
  • US11897460B2 patent drawing
  • US11897460B2 patent drawing
  • US11897460B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Among other things, sensor signals are received using a vehicle comprising an autonomous driving capability. A risk associated with operating the vehicle is identified based on the sensor signals. The autonomous driving capability is modified in response to the risk. The operation of the vehicle is updated based on the modifying of the autonomous capability.