Autonomous Driving Software Segmentation for Regional Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Integrated autonomous driving software struggles to adapt to varying regional driving environments, leading to potential accidents, and is often not reusable across different vehicle hardware configurations.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that provide customized autonomous driving software for specific sections of a driving route, selected based on user feedback, accident data, and usage fees, using a server and vehicle terminal communication to switch between optimized software for different service sections.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If integrated autonomous driving software is used to cover diverse road environments, then the software can be reused across different regions, but it cannot reflect variation factors such as regional driving environment, driving propensity, and topography, leading to accidents

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to regional driving environmentVSAvoidsafety in autonomous driving
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the driving route into multiple service sections (e.g., highway section, urban section, tunnel section) and assigns different specialized autonomous driving software to each section. This segmentation allows the system to use optimized software for specific environments rather than a single integrated software, improving both adaptability to regional characteristics and safety through specialized optimization for each section's unique conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by providing customized autonomous driving software tailored to each service section's specific characteristics. Each section receives software optimized for its local conditions (e.g., highway software for high-speed roads, urban software for city streets), ensuring that the autonomous driving system has the appropriate capabilities for each specific environment rather than using a uniform approach

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If customized autonomous driving software is provided for each service section, then safety and optimization for specific environments improve, but the system complexity increases due to multiple software versions and management requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety in autonomous drivingVSAvoidsoftware management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a server as an intermediary between the vehicle terminal and the multiple autonomous driving software versions. The server stores various specialized software, manages software selection based on service section identification, and transmits the appropriate software to the vehicle terminal. This intermediary handles the complexity of software management, allowing the vehicle system to benefit from multiple specialized software versions without bearing the full burden of managing them all

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If multiple candidate autonomous driving software are searched and selected based on user feedback, accident data, and usage fee, then optimal software selection improves, but the time and computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware selection qualityVSAvoidsoftware selection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-storing multiple candidate autonomous driving software versions on the server, each associated with specific service sections and evaluation criteria. When a vehicle requests software for a particular section, the server can quickly retrieve and evaluate pre-prepared candidates based on user feedback, accident data, and usage fees, rather than creating or analyzing software options in real-time. This preliminary preparation significantly reduces the time required for software selection while maintaining high selection quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11268823B2System and method for supporting autonomous vehicle
Publication Date: 2022.03.08 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US11268823B2 patent drawing
  • US11268823B2 patent drawing
  • US11268823B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and a method for supporting an autonomous vehicle are provided. The system may include a communicator configured to receive a driving route transmitted from a vehicle and a processor configured to extract a service section included in the driving route and to provide the vehicle with customized autonomous driving software for each service section of a plurality of service sections.