Autonomous Driving State Switching for Temporary Driver Intervention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing autonomous driving vehicle systems burden drivers with frequent state switching requirements when temporarily intervening in autonomous driving mode, leading to driver fatigue and inconvenience.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous driving vehicle system that includes a peripheral information detection unit, a traveling plan generation unit, and a driving state switching unit, which dynamically switches between autonomous, cooperative, and manual driving states based on operation amounts and duration counts, allowing for seamless transitions and reduced driver intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the driver operates a switch to intervene in autonomous driving mode, then the vehicle can respond to driver intentions, but the driver feels burdened due to frequent switching operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver operation burdenVSAvoidautonomous driving state maintenance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically detects driver intervention intentions through operation amount and duration count, and autonomously switches driving states without requiring driver operation of switches. The ECU 10 self-manages the state transitions based on detected operational parameters, eliminating the burden of manual switching while preserving autonomous driving functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors driver operations (steering angle, accelerator depression, brake application) and uses this feedback to dynamically adjust driving states. The ECU 10 compares operation amounts against threshold values and adjusts the autonomous/cooperative/manual driving state accordingly, creating a closed-loop system that responds to driver intentions without requiring explicit switching commands.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If the system requires manual switch operation for state transitions, then the driver has direct control, but the switching process becomes complex and inconvenient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestate switching convenienceVSAvoidswitching control mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical switch-operating system with an electronic detection and control system. Instead of requiring physical switch operations, the ECU 10 detects driver intentions through sensors measuring operational parameters (steering angle, accelerator position, brake pressure) and automatically executes state transitions through electronic control signals to the driving operation unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary layer (the ECU 10 and its driving state switching unit 16) between the driver's operational inputs and the vehicle's driving state changes. This intermediary automatically interprets operation amounts and duration counts, determines appropriate state transitions based on threshold comparisons, and executes the transitions without requiring direct driver interaction with switching mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the driver temporarily intervenes in autonomous driving, then the vehicle can handle unexpected situations, but the driver must manually switch states after intervention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver intervention capabilityVSAvoidtime for state switching
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of driver intervention intentions by monitoring operational parameters before a full state transition is required. The ECU 10 continuously measures operation amounts and duration counts, and when threshold values are exceeded, it proactively initiates state transitions to cooperative or manual driving modes, preventing the need for post-intervention switching operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuous monitoring of driver operations throughout autonomous driving mode, ensuring that intervention intentions are detected without interruption. This continuous detection enables seamless state transitions during and after temporary interventions, eliminating gaps or delays where the driver would otherwise need to manually switch states after completing an intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS11845473B2Autonomous driving apparatus including a driving state switcher
Publication Date: 2023.12.19 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US11845473B2 patent drawing
  • US11845473B2 patent drawing
  • US11845473B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system includes an acquisition unit that acquires an operation amount or a duration count, and a switching unit that switches a driving state. The switching unit switches the driving state to the cooperative driving state when the operation amount is equal to or greater than an intervention threshold and less than a start threshold or the duration count is equal to or greater than a first threshold and less than a second threshold during the autonomous driving state, switches the driving state to the autonomous driving state when the operation amount is less than the intervention threshold or the duration count is less than the first threshold during the cooperative driving state, and switches the driving state to the manual driving state when the operation amount is equal to or greater than the start threshold or the duration count is equal to or greater than the second threshold.