Autonomous Driving Test Approximation with Trained Neural Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for testing vehicle functions in autonomous driving are time-consuming and costly due to the need for extensive real-world testing, and existing algorithms do not efficiently reduce these costs.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using a trained artificial neural network to approximate test results of virtual tests for autonomous vehicle control, utilizing specific driving situation parameters and objective functions to efficiently simulate safety, comfort, and energy consumption scenarios.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If extensive real-world testing and simulations are conducted to verify autonomous driving functions, then the reliability and safety of the vehicle function are improved, but the time and cost required for testing increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification reliabilityVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates virtual copies of real-world driving scenarios through simulated environments. Instead of physically testing every possible driving situation, the system generates virtual test cases that replicate real-world conditions, allowing comprehensive verification without the time and resource costs of actual road testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary analysis to identify critical driving situations and parameters before conducting full-scale testing. By pre-determining which scenarios are most relevant for safety verification, the system can focus testing resources on high-impact cases rather than exhaustively testing all possible situations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If extensive real-world testing and simulations are conducted to verify autonomous driving functions, then the reliability and safety of the vehicle function are improved, but the cost of testing increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification reliabilityVSAvoidtesting cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive real-world testing with cost-effective virtual simulations. By copying driving scenarios in a simulated environment, the system achieves the same verification goals without the substantial costs associated with physical test drives, sensor calibration, and human safety personnel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses computationally inexpensive virtual test cases that can be generated and discarded quickly. Instead of investing in long-term, expensive physical testing infrastructure, the system creates numerous low-cost simulated scenarios that can be rapidly executed and replaced as needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Reliability

If a large number of potentially possible driving situations are tested to ensure safety, then the comprehensiveness of testing is improved, but the complexity of the testing system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting comprehensivenessVSAvoidtesting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the complex testing problem into manageable segments by categorizing driving situations into distinct scenarios with specific parameters. Instead of treating all possible driving situations as a single complex problem, the system segments them into structured test cases that can be independently generated, executed, and analyzed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent systematically varies key parameters such as environmental conditions, vehicle states, and traffic scenarios to generate diverse test cases. By changing parameters in a controlled manner rather than randomly, the system achieves comprehensive coverage while maintaining organizational structure and reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3783452B1Computer-implemented method and test unit for approximizing test results and method for providing a trained, artificial neural network
Publication Date: 2025.08.06 DSPACE SE & CO KG
  • EP3783452B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3783452B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3783452B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

The invention relates to a computer-implemented method for approximating test results of a virtual test of a device for at least partial autonomous driving of a motor vehicle. The invention further relates to a computer-implemented method for providing a trained artificial neural network, a test unit (1), a computer program, and a computer-readable data carrier.