Autonomous Driving Agent Human Trust Calibration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Human trust and cognitive workload in autonomous driving systems are not effectively calibrated, leading to potential misuse due to either under-trust or over-reliance on automation, which can result in unsafe conditions.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous driving agent that uses sensor information to estimate belief states of human trust and cognitive workload, dynamically controlling the display system to provide cues for calibration of automation transparency, thereby influencing human behavior and trust through a Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) framework.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the autonomous driving system provides high automation transparency, then human trust is improved, but cognitive workload increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehuman trustVSAvoidcognitive workload
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts automation transparency based on real-time estimation of human trust and cognitive workload states. The circuitry modifies the level of information provided to the human user dynamically, increasing transparency when trust is low and decreasing it when cognitive workload is high, thereby resolving the contradiction between building trust and maintaining ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of automation transparency based on estimated belief states of human trust and cognitive workload. By adjusting this parameter dynamically according to the human operator's state, the system optimizes the balance between establishing trust and preventing cognitive overload

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If the autonomous driving system provides low automation transparency, then cognitive workload is reduced, but human trust decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecognitive workloadVSAvoidhuman trust
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts automation transparency based on real-time estimation of human trust and cognitive workload states. The circuitry modifies the level of information provided to the human user dynamically, increasing transparency when trust is low and decreasing it when cognitive workload is high, thereby resolving the contradiction between building trust and maintaining ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from observed human behavior (eye tracking, cognitive workload indicators) to adjust automation transparency. By continuously monitoring human responses and adjusting the level of information provided accordingly, the system maintains an optimal balance between building trust and preventing cognitive overload

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If the system continuously monitors human trust and cognitive workload, then calibration accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The circuitry performs multiple functions using a unified approach: it estimates human trust, estimates cognitive workload, selects automation transparency levels, and controls display outputs all through a single integrated system. This multi-functionality reduces overall system complexity while maintaining high calibration accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system estimates belief states for multiple parameters (human trust and cognitive workload) simultaneously and uses these parameter changes to drive a single control decision regarding automation transparency. This coordinated parameter management achieves high calibration accuracy without proportionally increasing system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11332165B2Human trust calibration for autonomous driving agent of vehicle
Publication Date: 2022.05.17 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US11332165B2 patent drawing
  • US11332165B2 patent drawing
  • US11332165B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An autonomous driving agent is provided. The autonomous driving agent determines a set of observations from sensor information of a sensor system of a vehicle. The set of observations includes human attention information for a scene of surrounding environment and a level of human reliance as indicated by human inputs to the autonomous driving agent. The autonomous driving agent estimates, based on the set of observations, belief states for a first state of human trust on the autonomous driving agent and a second state of human's cognitive workload during journey. The autonomous driving agent selects, based on the estimated belief states, a first value for a first action associated with a level of automation transparency between a human user and the autonomous driving agent and controls a display system based on the selected first value to display a cue for calibration of the human trust on the autonomous driving agent.