Autonomous Vehicle Fallback Architecture With Partial Redundancy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in maintaining driving capabilities when sensors or components fail due to degradation, especially with size, cost, and placement constraints, necessitating a feasible redundant architecture.

Innovation Solution

Implement partial redundancy in sensor and computing systems with fallback configurations, utilizing distinct operating domains for sensors and computing subsystems, along with independent power distribution, to ensure minimum functionality and safe operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If complete redundancy of every component and subsystem is implemented, then reliability is improved, but device complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving capability reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides sensors and computing subsystems into distinct operating domains (first set of sensors with first computing subsystem, second set of sensors with second computing subsystem). This segmentation allows partial redundancy where each domain can independently operate, providing reliability without requiring complete redundancy of all components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial redundancy rather than complete redundancy. Each computing subsystem is configured to process sensor data from its associated sensors independently, providing sufficient redundancy for safe operation without the excessive complexity and cost of duplicating every component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Reliability

If complete redundancy of every component and subsystem is implemented, then reliability is improved, but cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving capability reliabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the system into distinct operating domains with associated sensors and computing subsystems, the patent achieves reliability through partial redundancy. This approach reduces manufacturing cost compared to complete redundancy while maintaining the ability to operate safely when components fail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies redundancy locally to critical components (sensors and computing subsystems in separate operating domains) rather than uniformly to all components. This local quality approach ensures reliability where needed while reducing overall system cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If sensor suites are expanded to provide full redundancy, then reliability is improved, but vehicle size and placement constraints are violated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor system reliabilityVSAvoidvehicle size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments sensors into first and second sets associated with different operating domains, allowing compact arrangement on the vehicle. This segmentation provides reliability through domain independence while respecting vehicle size constraints by avoiding the need for extensive sensor expansion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial redundancy with sensor sets distributed across different operating domains rather than complete redundancy requiring extensive sensor suites. This approach achieves sufficient reliability while maintaining compliance with vehicle size and placement constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP4711226A2Redundant hardware system for autonomous vehicles
Publication Date: 2026.03.18 WAYMO LLC
  • EP4711226A2 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4711226A2 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4711226A2 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The technology relates to partially redundant equipment architectures for vehicles able to operate in an autonomous driving mode. Aspects of the technology employ fallback configurations, such as two or more fallback sensor configurations that provide some minimum amount of field of view (FOV) around the vehicle (Figs. 11B, 11C and 11D). For instance, different sensor arrangements are logically associated with different operating domains of the vehicle (Fig. 12). Fallback configurations for computing resources (1202a, 1202b) and/or power resources (1302a, 1302b) are also provided. Each fallback configuration may have different reasons for being triggered (1408), and may result in different types of fallback modes of operation (1410, 1412). Triggering conditions may relate, e.g., to a type of failure, fault or other reduction in component capability, the current driving mode, environmental conditions in the vicinity of vehicle or along a planned route, or other factors. Fallback modes may involve altering a previously planned trajectory, altering vehicle speed, and/or altering a destination of the vehicle.