Autonomous Fleet Compatibility Screening for Reliable Ride Assignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing autonomous vehicle systems face inefficiencies in matching users with compatible vehicle fleets, leading to potential service cancellations, unnecessary resource allocation, and suboptimal route planning due to limitations in autonomy capabilities and user preferences.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that determine compatibility between users and autonomous vehicle fleets by analyzing user and vehicle fleet features, including autonomy capabilities and user preferences, to select the most suitable fleet for vehicle services, thereby optimizing resource usage and ensuring route adherence within vehicle capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If autonomous vehicle systems assign vehicles to users without compatibility analysis, then service speed is improved, but service reliability deteriorates due to potential cancellations and route failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice speedVSAvoidservice reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs compatibility analysis between user profiles and vehicle fleet features before assigning vehicles. This preliminary action includes comparing user preferences, autonomy capability requirements, and vehicle capabilities to predict service success and prevent cancellations, thereby improving reliability without significantly impacting service speed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a compatibility prediction mechanism as an intermediary between user service requests and vehicle assignment. This intermediary analyzes user profiles against vehicle fleet features and autonomously determines compatibility, enabling fast and reliable assignments without requiring manual intervention or post-assignment adjustments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the system analyzes all user and vehicle features to determine compatibility, then service reliability is improved, but computational resource usage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice reliabilityVSAvoidcomputational resource usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and analyzes only the critical compatibility features from user profiles and vehicle fleet data, rather than processing all available information. By identifying and focusing on key parameters that determine compatibility, the system achieves reliable vehicle-user matching with reduced computational overhead

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the compatibility determination problem into a parameter-based prediction model. By changing the approach from comprehensive analysis to parameter-specific evaluation, the system efficiently assesses compatibility using selected key parameters, thereby reducing computational resource consumption while maintaining service reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If the system predicts vehicle performance based on autonomy capabilities, then service quality is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates simplified predictive models that replicate the relationship between autonomy capabilities and vehicle performance. Instead of implementing complex real-time simulation, the patent uses pre-established prediction models that copy the essential performance characteristics, enabling high service quality determination with reduced system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent simplifies the performance prediction by focusing on key autonomy capability parameters rather than analyzing all vehicle systems in detail. By changing the approach to evaluate only the most critical autonomy parameters relevant to service quality, the system achieves accurate predictions without requiring overly complex analysis mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11745759B2Systems and methods for selective autonomous vehicle ridership and control
Publication Date: 2023.09.05 UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US11745759B2 patent drawing
  • US11745759B2 patent drawing
  • US11745759B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for autonomous vehicle operations are provided. An example computer-implemented method includes obtaining data indicative of vehicle fleet feature(s) associated with an autonomous vehicle fleet. The method includes obtaining data indicative of a vehicle service request associated with a user, the vehicle service request indicating a request for a vehicle service. The method includes determining user feature(s) associated with the user. The method includes determining a compatibility of the user and the autonomous vehicle fleet for the vehicle service based at least in part on the fleet feature(s) and the user feature(s). Determining the compatibility can include predicting how the autonomous vehicle fleet will perform the vehicle service associated with the vehicle service request based at least in part on the fleet's autonomy capabilities. The method includes communicating data associated with the vehicle service request to a computing system associated with the autonomous vehicle fleet.