Autonomous Fleet Controller for Predictive Scheduling and Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increasing complexity and cost of autonomous vehicle fleets require centralized management systems to optimize vehicle use, safety, and maintenance, particularly in anticipating demand and managing individual vehicles efficiently.

Innovation Solution

A fleet management system that includes a fleet controller, scheduler, and IoT backbone for real-time monitoring and control of autonomous vehicles, enabling persistent connections, role-based access, component tracking, predictive maintenance, and anticipatory vehicle positioning based on demand forecasting and real-time data analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If centralized fleet management systems are implemented to control autonomous vehicles, then vehicle scheduling efficiency and safety are improved, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle scheduling efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fleet management system is segmented into multiple independent functional modules including vehicle assignment module, scheduling module, monitoring module, and control module. Each module operates autonomously with specific responsibilities, allowing the complex system to be managed through modular components that can be developed, maintained, and scaled independently, thus improving scheduling efficiency without proportionally increasing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The fleet controller is designed as a universal platform that performs multiple functions including vehicle assignment, mission scheduling, real-time monitoring, and emergency intervention. This multi-functional design consolidates what would otherwise require separate specialized systems into a single integrated controller, improving productivity while managing system complexity through consolidation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If real-time monitoring and persistent connections are maintained for all vehicles, then safety and control are improved, but communication bandwidth and system resources are consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidcommunication bandwidth consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic monitoring and status reporting intervals for vehicles under normal operating conditions, rather than continuous real-time communication. This allows the fleet controller to maintain awareness of vehicle status while significantly reducing communication bandwidth consumption. The periodic action is supplemented by event-triggered communications when critical events occur

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback mechanisms where vehicles report status changes and the fleet controller adjusts monitoring intensity based on operational context. During normal operations, monitoring is reduced to periodic checks, but when anomalies or critical events are detected, the system automatically increases monitoring frequency, thus maintaining safety while optimizing resource usage through adaptive feedback-driven communication

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If predictive maintenance and component tracking are implemented, then vehicle availability and productivity are improved, but data processing requirements and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle availabilityVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements predictive maintenance by continuously monitoring vehicle component conditions and predicting potential failures before they occur. This preliminary action allows maintenance to be scheduled proactively, preventing vehicle downtime and improving availability. The system tracks component health metrics and uses this data to anticipate maintenance needs, addressing issues before they impact productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The fleet management system automatically processes component tracking data and generates maintenance schedules without requiring manual intervention. The system self-monitors vehicle status, automatically identifies maintenance requirements, and coordinates service activities, thereby improving vehicle availability while managing data processing complexity through automated self-service mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Ease of operation

If anticipatory vehicle positioning based on demand forecasting is implemented, then customer service quality is improved, but computational requirements and scheduling complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer service qualityVSAvoidscheduling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs demand forecasting and anticipates future service requirements, then proactively positions vehicles at optimal locations before demand occurs. This preliminary action improves customer service quality by reducing wait times and ensuring vehicle availability when needed, while the forecasting algorithms and automated positioning logic manage the inherent scheduling complexity through systematic prediction and planning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250239167A1Fleet Controller
Publication Date: 2025.07.24 TEXTRON INNOVATIONS INC
  • US20250239167A1 patent drawing
  • US20250239167A1 patent drawing
  • US20250239167A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for controlling an autonomous vehicle fleet, including obtaining, by a fleet controller, from a master schedule, a mission for a vehicle of a fleet of autonomous vehicles, where the mission is associated with a mission entry of the master schedule, generating vehicle commands according to mission parameters associated with the mission, maintaining a persistent connection with the vehicle, sending the vehicle commands to the vehicle using the connection, the vehicle commands causing the vehicle to execute the mission under control of the fleet controller, and monitoring operation of the vehicle during performance of the mission.